Monday, November 3, 2014

How is betrayal shown in The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver?

There are numerous instances of betrayal in The Poisonwood Bible.  In many of them, the betrayal when examined turns out not to have been a betrayal after all.  Often it is better described as the act of a limited person, doing the best they could under difficult circumstances, which then caused damage to someone else.  However, examining the betrayal takes a long time - the whole book, in fact - and during that long time, the betrayal seem inexcusable. 


The clearest example of this is the scene when the driver ants come to the village.  These are ants that run over everything and bite anyone who is in their path.  When they come in a huge flow, in the middle of the night, the only way to escape them is to get across the river.  So the whole village is rushing to the river to get on boats.


The Price family, as is typical of them, don't stop to help one another.  They flee, each on their own, except for Orleanna, the mother, who carries out Ruth May, the littlest one. 


Adah, at age 14, is one of the twins. She is lame because of a birth defect, and can only walk dragging one leg.  She asks her mother for help, but their mother is carrying Ruth May, and the only way she can help Adah is to say "Come on" and turn and start off for the river.   As far as Adah is concerned, her mother has left her behind.  She gets knocked down in the crowd, trampled on, and could have died, but their Congolese friend Anatole (sent by Adah's twin Leah) comes and saves her.  


To Adah, this incident "marks my life's dark center."  For many years, she goes on thinking that her mother has rejected her.  She imagines that her mother thought her life less worthy of saving than Ruth May's because Adah was an awkward, crippled teenager rather than a sweet little blond girl. 


Years later, she finds out that this was not so.  "After Ruth May you were my youngest, Adah.  When push comes to shove, a mother takes care of her children from the bottom up." 


Other instances of betrayal in The Poisonwood Bible:


  • Nate Price betrays his family in many ways.  He is a Pharisaical, abusive husband and father.  But his ultimate betrayal comes when he insists that the family stay in the Congo when independence, with its almost certain violence, is coming up and the mission is recommending the family evacuate.  His willingness to sacrifice his family ushers in an era of starvation for them and ultimately leads to the death of one family member and the dispersal of the others.  But when Orleanna tells us his back story, we can understand Nate's motivations, even if we cannot forgive him.

  • One major theme of the book is the betrayal inherent in colonialism.  Belgium ruled the Congo very harshly, then suddenly granted it independence with no training or preparation.  Nate Price, who is ostensibly coming to do God's work among the Congolese people, refuses to learn about their culture, and disrespects, offends and misunderstands them at every turn.  Some of the white characters (Orleanna and Leah) struggle with guilt over their own behavior in the Congo.  Their stories explore the question of whether it is possible, as one of a race that has practiced colonialism, to come to a foreign country without participating in betrayal.  As Orleanna puts it in her introduction, "We stepped down there on a place we believed unformed ... But what else could we have thought?  Only that it began and ended with us.  What do we know, even now?"

  • The twins, Leah and Adah, have their own issues with betrayal.  Adah was born with a slight brain injury that caused her to limp.  Both of the twins believe that Leah, who was born healthy and strong, somehow caused this in the womb by taking more than her fair share of nutrients or space.  Thus Adah resents Leah for being the healthy, strong twin, and Leah feels guilty and frustrated with her sister.  Both of them deal with this on their own separate tracks, and it is not until middle adulthood that they become friends. 

  • Orleanna feels guilty for the fact that Ruth May dies.  She wishes she had stood up to Nate before such a thing could happen, and gotten herself and her girls out of there.  She feels that she betrayed them, when in fact, she was doing the best she could.  In fact, for most of the book, the older girls spend a lot of time blaming Orleanna for not being able to make things better: She cannot make a decent meal out of the food that's available, she goes all passive and silent when Nate goes on an abusive rant ... she cannot save them from their father or from Africa.  It's not until the end of the book that they realize she did a very good job with them. 

What were the characteristic features of the Renaissance?

There were a number of characteristics of the Renaissance that set it apart from the centuries that preceded it in Europe. The period saw a renewed interest in the classical works of Greece and Rome. For this reason, humanism was an important element. Humanism placed an emphasis away from divine images and focused on the greatness of the human form. In the same vein, Renaissance artists and philosophers stressed personal and individual achievement, particularly in the areas of science and architecture. Out of this environment, scientific discovery and business enterprise flourished. Many of the Renaissance artists and thinkers pursued a number of different fields and excelled in a wide array of endeavors. This was a reflection on the importance of learning.  With the increased interest in humanism, religion, particularly Catholicism, declined in importance and influence.

How does William Blake represent the animal in the poem "The Tyger?"

In the first stanza, the tiger is "fearful." The word "dread" is repeated three times in the poem. The tiger is associated with fear, dread, and terror. Clearly, the speaker is describing the tiger as something to be feared. This leads one to suppose other associations, such as violence or perhaps even evil. 


Note that in the fifth stanza, Blake invokes fallen angels and/or The Fall of Adam and Eve. This suggests that the tiger was created with or after The Fall. Therefore, the tiger comes after the fall from paradise. The tiger is born with the world of sin and experience. The tiger is coeval with the notions of original sin and the first experiences of fallen humanity. In this same stanza, the speaker asks if the same God created both the tiger and the lamb. The lamb is associated with Christ and peace. So, the speaker wonders if the same God could or would create two things so vastly different. The lamb is peace and love and the tiger represents ferocity and violence. Some interpret this poem to be a meditation on God's mysterious ways. Why would an omniscient or all-loving God create a world capable of something so violent? And generally speaking, why would an all-loving God create the potential for violence and suffering? 

How does Roald Dahl use metaphor in "Lamb to the Slaughter"?

Roald Dahl uses metaphor to better describe Mary Maloney in his short story "Lamb to the Slaughter." 


A metaphor makes a comparison between two things that are unrelated but share some common characteristics. Working with that definition, a simile is a type of metaphor, because it also makes a comparison in the same manner.  A simile simply uses "like" or "as" to make the comparison.  


The following is a simile from "Lamb to the Slaughter." 



She loved to luxuriate in the presence of this man, and to feel – almost as a sunbather feels the sun – that warm male glow that came out of him to her when they were alone together.



Patrick's very presence is equivalent to the life giving solar energy of the sun for Mary.  She practically bathes in his glow.  


As for a standard metaphor, the title hints at the extended metaphor of the story.  Mary is meek and mild like a lamb.  When Patrick delivers his awful news, Mary is devastated.  In a way, she and her life have been completely slaughtered by Patrick's betrayal.  Then Mary, the lamb, brings an actual leg of lamb to a new slaughter.  Patrick's slaughter.  The lamb has now become the slaughterer.  

Sunday, November 2, 2014

In The Giver, what could've happened to the community when they got the memories back? Did they they get all of the memories back? Did Jonas get to...

The ending of Lois Lowry's The Giver, is notoriously ambiguous. Many questions remain unanswered and the reader has the opportunity to examine the possibilities of what they think happens after Jonas leaves his community.


As long as the community has a designated person to hold the memories of the past, then the citizens remain unaware of certain histories and emotions. Jonas and The Giver feel that "memories need to be shared" (158). Without Jonas to receive the memories, they will return to the people. After Jonas leaves with Gabriel, then ideally all of the memories that The Giver holds will be released into the community. The citizens will become aware of the history of the world, and the reality of their present community. Although the community in The Giver seems to be a utopia, the reality is quite the opposite. The reality is that their community is more of a dystopia because the people have no real say in what happens in their own lives. The purpose of giving the memories back to the people is to allow them the right to make their own choices and decisions, and let them feel love and joy and even sorrow. Even though they will learn negative and possibly hurtful things, they will be able to live their lives fully and find what actually makes them happy.


As for Jonas, after his long grueling trip in harsh weather, the book ends with him arriving at a hill where he finds a sled. Interestingly, the memory of snow and the sled was the first memory that The Giver transferred to Jonas, bringing Jonas' journey full circle. Jonas and Gabriel ride the sled down the hill and Jonas sees a small house with Christmas lights and hears music. However, the music is coming not only from the house, but from behind in the distance as well.



"Behind him, across the vast distance of space and time, from the place he had left, he thought he heard music too. But perhaps it was only an echo" (183).



While the ending remains ambiguous, many possibilities have been discussed regarding what happens to Jonas. One possibility includes Jonas and Gabe arriving Elsewhere and perhaps living a happy life with the family in the small house at the end of the hill while his old community sings joyously for their future. Another possibility includes Jonas arriving Elsewhere in a metaphorical sense of the term after he passes away from the elements; the music he hears is his wish for his old community. One more option for the ending involves Jonas and Gabe making a circular journey and the scene that he sees at the bottom of the hill is in fact his community after they have received the memories.


The ambiguity at the end of the novel allows the reader to take their own experiences reading the text and explore possible endings. The fate of both Jonas and the community do not have to remain within the limits of the pages; the next step can be anything the reader imagines.

Saturday, November 1, 2014

How would you define and describe apartheid law? Why did the government introduce this law and how did it affect people on a daily basis?

Apartheid was a system that was in place in South Africa. It kept white people in power and separated the races.


A good example of an apartheid law was the Reservation of Separate Amenities Act of 1953. This law provided for separate facilities in many public places for white people and non-white people, including restaurants, schools, theaters, and bathrooms. There were many amendments to this Act, including one that said these facilities didn’t have to be equal in terms of quality.


The government passed this law to keep the races apart. The government also wanted to keep white people in power.


This law affected people significantly. Non-white people weren’t treated equally to white people. Their facilities were inferior to those white people had. This Act sent a strong message about how white people viewed those who weren’t white. Non-white people had limited opportunities and experiences because of this law.

A man has $100 and decides to invest it in a bank for 6 years. The bank gives him two choices, annual rate of interest 2%, compounded annually,...

Since the bank is paying compound interest , we have to use the formula for compound interest for calculating the amount.


The formula is,


`A_t=P(1+r/n)^(nt)`  


where ,


`A_t`  is the amount at the end of t years of investment


P is the principal


r is the annual rate of interest, 


n is the number of compounding periods per year


Case 1


Given P=$100, t= 6 years , n=1 as interest is compounded annually, r=2%


Now plug in the given values in the formula to calculate the amount at the end of 6 years of investment,


So, `A_6=100(1+2/100)^6`


`A_6=100(1+1/50)^6`


`=100(51/50)^6`


`=100(1.02)^6`


`=112.6162419`


`~~112.62`


Case 2 


Given: P=$100 , r=1.8% , n=4 ( as interest is compounded quarterly ) , t=6 years


Now plug the given values in the formula to calculate the amount at the end of 6 years,


`A_6=100(1+1.8/(4*100))^(4*6)`


`=100(1.0045)^24`


`=111.3777874`


`~~111.38`


So the first option is better with annual rate of interest 2% compounded annually, as the amount received after 6 years of investment is more than the second option.

Thomas Jefferson's election in 1800 is sometimes called the Revolution of 1800. Why could it be described in this way?

Thomas Jefferson’s election in 1800 can be called the “Revolution of 1800” because it was the first time in America’s short history that pow...