Friday, August 12, 2011

The following sentence is ambiguous. Provide two explanations which illustrate the different meanings of the sentence: I saw her duck.

The problem with this sentence is that it is unclear if I saw an animal ("her duck"), or if I saw her perform the action of ducking. Let's break each possibility down grammatically.


The first possibility: "duck" could be the direct object of the sentence. A direct object is the person or thing that receives or is affected by an action. In this case, the action is "saw," simple past form of "see." So, if I say, "I saw her duck," then I am referring to my encounter with the pet duck of some unnamed girl or woman. The phrase "her duck" takes the form of a verb complement. The complement is necessary in order to know what "I saw."


The second possibility: "duck" is used as a verb to express "her" action. In this sentence, "I" is the subject, "saw" in the main verb, and "her" is the direct object. "Duck" is the action I saw her perform.


This sentence could be revised for clarity in two ways: "She ducked" ('duck' is an intransitive verb), or "I saw her ducking," which transforms 'duck' into a gerund, or the thing I saw her doing.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thomas Jefferson's election in 1800 is sometimes called the Revolution of 1800. Why could it be described in this way?

Thomas Jefferson’s election in 1800 can be called the “Revolution of 1800” because it was the first time in America’s short history that pow...