Naturalistic observation, often used in psychology and other social sciences, involves examining subjects in their usual settings, without intervention of any sort. The advantage is that this type of observation helps the observer understand the way a subject really acts in his or her environment, and this type of research can be inexpensive and easy to implement. This type of research can add to the validity of the observations, as subjects' behavior can change in a laboratory or clinical setting. Another advantage of this type of research is that often it is not ethical to put subjects in a clinical setting or remove them from their natural environment. The disadvantage of naturalistic observation is that the observer might be changing the behavior of the subjects without meaning to do so. In addition, the observer might lack structure to the way he or she observes; therefore, the observations of two different researchers about the same phenomenon or subject might vary because they are not observing in a structured way.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Thomas Jefferson's election in 1800 is sometimes called the Revolution of 1800. Why could it be described in this way?
Thomas Jefferson’s election in 1800 can be called the “Revolution of 1800” because it was the first time in America’s short history that pow...
-
It is, in large part, thanks to Tobe that the character of Miss Emily earns her symbolic "rose." Tobe's loyalty and dedication...
-
After Juliet learns that her new husband, Romeo, has killed her cousin, Tybalt, her thoughtful response showcases her intelligence. She kno...
-
Roald Dahl uses metaphor to better describe Mary Maloney in his short story "Lamb to the Slaughter." A metaphor makes a compariso...
No comments:
Post a Comment