Saturday, June 30, 2012

What is Jonathan lwegbu's attitude toward life? Please illustrate with examples from the text that show his attitude. Why did Jonathan mistrust...

Jonathan Iwegbu is the protagonist in Chinua Achebe’s short story “Civil Peace.” This story was written shortly after a three-year-long civil war in which Nigeria’s Ibo people attempted and ultimately failed to separate themselves from Nigeria to establish their own nation. With this kind of background, it might be easy to write a protagonist who is angry, bitter, or vengeful. But in Iwegbu, we get a character who is the opposite of those things. Instead, he is an optimistic, grateful, industrious, resilient man of faith who understands what truly has value and in whose hands his life lies.


Achebe (1971) introduces readers to Iwegbu in the first sentence: “Jonathan Iwegbu counted himself extraordinarily lucky.” He also tells us that “happy survival” is part of Iwegbu’s character and that "[h]e had come out of the war with five inestimable blessings—his head, his wife Maria’s head, and the heads of three out of their four children." We know immediately that Iwegbu has lost one child in the war, yet we find him not angry but grateful for those who survived. Iwegbu is also blessed to still have his bicycle, which he nearly lost during the war. He was able to bribe the “officer” trying to take his bike with money he had set aside for firewood. He buries the bicycle until the war is over. He is amazed when he finds it still serviceable, and declares, “Nothing puzzles God” (Achebe, 1971). This is a phrase repeated three times in the text, and it can be understood as, “God knows best.” Iwegbu seems to live his life in accordance with this belief.


In addition to being grateful, Iwegbu is industrious. He uses his bicycle to start a taxi business. He supports his children in selling mangoes to soldiers’ wives and his wife in making and selling akara balls to neighbors. When he has saved some money, he opens up a bar “for soldiers and other people with money" (Achebe, 1971). Instead of mourning what he has lost, instead of sitting around waiting for his situation to change, Iwegbu works harder and begins to remake a life for himself and his family.


Another of the miracles Iwegbu discovers, and presumably part of the reason he believes himself to be so blessed, is that his house, although in the middle of a war zone, has survived mostly intact. Although “the doors and windows were missing and five sheets off the roof,” Iwegbu asks, “But what is that?” and sets about picking up pieces of wood and soggy cardboard and hiring a “destitute carpenter with one old hammer, a bent plane, and a few bent and rusty nails” to repair the damage to their home (Achebe, 1971). He realizes again that he is blessed when he discovers that many with whom he worked pre-war had nowhere to return; they sleep in the dirt outside the company offices and scrounge what food they can. Even when his ex gratia money is stolen, Iwegbu tells his sympathetic neighbors, “I count it as nothing” and reminds them that nothing puzzles God. He also makes the point that he did not have that money the day before, or the week before, and it has no value  compared to other things he could have lost. True to his character, Iwegbu and his family pick up and begin again; without complaining he straps his demijohn to his bicycle, his wife begins making akara balls, and his son rinses out beer bottles. Readers understand that life will go on in “happy survival” (Achebe, 1971) for Jonathan Iwegbu.

Thursday, June 28, 2012

How does El Nino affect the world?

El Nino is a term that is used to describe the increase in the surface water temperature of the central Pacific Ocean.  This occurs when north-easterly trade winds which serve to keep the surface of the water cool are weakened.  The area of ocean affected is a large area of water that when warmed, has a significant effect on the weather systems throughout the world.   


El Nino results in more rainfall in parts of South America and the southwest United States.  In addition, there is an increase in hurricane activity.  Furthermore, El Nino increases high pressure over much of Europe resulting in drier weather with higher temperatures.  The weather in Canada is warmer than usual when an El Nino event occurs.  Moreover, snowfall is reduced in central U.S. states.


These weather changes can produce significant changes in agriculture for the year in which the event occurs.  Furthermore, it can have an effect on the abundance and price of many commodities and goods; this can have a significant effect on developing countries.  Deadly storms may be more likely to occur in some places throughout Earth.  In addition, countries face a significant financial burden as a result of the aforementioned occurrences.  

How is "Upon my head they placed a fruitless crown" portrayed through the character of Macbeth?

When Macbeth murders Duncan, he can no longer go back to the point when his conscience was more or less clear. He has stepped into the realm of darkness, where he is tortured by his thoughts of insecurity and doubt. The witches' prophecy becomes engraved in his mind, and he cannot help but remember the witches said Banquo's sons would inherit the throne one day. This news greatly perturbs him:



They hail'd him father to a line of kings:
Upon my head they placed a fruitless crown,
And put a barren sceptre in my gripe,
Thence to be wrench'd with an unlineal hand,
No son of mine succeeding. 



Although Macbeth gains power when he takes the throne, in a way, he loses more. He loses his peace, compassion, and all sense of right and wrong. He becomes tormented by his insecurities and his belief that others will attempt to dethrone him. 


Macbeth takes the witches' prophecy too seriously and decides to kill Banquo and his son. This will lead to many more misdeeds on Macbeth's part because he has forever lost his common sense. He wants to get rid of anyone who could potentially harm him in any way. This will lead to his imminent downfall.

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

How would you explain the poem "Advice to My Son" by Peter Meinke?

In this poem, a parent--either a mother or father--provides guidance to a son about how to live life. In the first stanza, the parent suggests that the son must "live your days / as if each one may be your last" (lines 1-2). The son must realize that life can be fleeting and, unfortunately, can end at any time. However, at the same time, the son must "plan long range" (line 5). If the son survives, he must plan ahead so that his days resemble heaven more than hell.


The parent's advice in the second stanza follows along the same lines, as it involves suggestions that the son balance the practical with the beautiful. For example, the son must plant not only peonies and roses, which are for beauty alone, but also practical foods such as tomatoes, squash, spinach, and others. This idea is metaphorical. The parent means that the son must cultivate activities that are for beauty at the same time that he attends to practical matters in life. Similarly, the son should marry a beautiful wife but, in a practical vein, investigate the wife's mother before he marries to see that she has aged well and is a good person. The son can be soulmates with one person but just work practically alongside another. In the last two lines, the parent suggests that the son always have bread--the practical part of life--along with wine--the beautiful part of life. 

In "Everyday Use," how would you describe the way that Dee reacts to the food and objects in her mother’s house? Discuss Dee’s mother’s and...

It can be argued that Dee (Wangero) reacts to the objects and foods in her mother's house with seeming wonder and admiration. On the surface, Dee's bubbly demeanor is infectious; she is extravagant in her praise for the heirloom quilts, the churn top, and the dasher.


However, all is not as it seems. Dee's new alter-ego is Wangero, and she makes it known to her mother and sister that Wangero is unabashedly cosmopolitan, empowered, and enlightened. Alice Walker uses the character of Dee to portray those in the Black Power movement who, in the journey to rediscover their African heritage, unintentionally marginalize their African-American peers.


Although Walker understands the desire of those in the Black Power movement to reclaim their rightful legacy in Africa, she disagrees with their tendency to trivialize the sacrifices of African-Americans on American soil. Historical records indicate that a substantial number of African-Americans fought on the side of the North in the Civil War; still many others participated in peaceful resistance against the Jim Crow laws and others fought to secure freedoms for all during the two major world wars. In the story, Alice Walker alludes to African-American sacrifice by highlighting the rich history of the quilts:




In both of them were scraps of dresses Grandma Dee had worn fifty and more years ago. Bits and pieces of Grandpa Jattell's Paisley shirts. And one teeny faded blue piece, about the size of a penny matchbox, that was from Great Grandpa Ezra's uniform that he wore in the Civil War.



For her part, Dee (Wangero) decides to relegate her mother and her sister, Maggie, to the outer fringes of her new consciousness; to her, their seemingly wilful ignorance and dangerous sentimentalism offends her present sensibilities. Unmindful of Maggie's feelings, Dee aims to appropriate the quilts for herself, maintaining that Maggie will "probably be backward enough to put them to everyday use," if the quilts are left in her care. Maggie, quiet and patient, decides that she will not argue with her flamboyant and beautiful sister.



"She can have them, Mama," she said, like somebody used to never winning anything, or having anything reserved for her. "I can 'member Grandma Dee without the quilts."



Because of her injuries, Maggie has always taken a back seat to Dee's more extroverted personality; additionally, in light of Dee's new identity, Maggie finds herself intimidated into subservience. For her part, although Mama is proud of Dee, she is also irritated and hurt by Dee's assumed, superior attitude towards her and Maggie. Mama knows that Dee has always been materialistic; yet, coupled with her stubborn new focus on an idealized Africa, Mama fears that Dee has forgotten to cherish all that the African-American experience encompasses.



Dee wanted nice things.  A yellow organdy dress to wear to her graduation from high school; black pumps to match a green suit she’d made from an old suit somebody gave me.  She was determined to stare down any disaster in her efforts.  Her eyelids would not flicker for minutes at a time.  Often I fought off the temptation to shake her.  At sixteen she had a style all her own: and knew what style was.



Through Dee, Maggie, and Mama, Alice Walker makes the point that African-Americans should embrace all of their history, including the unpleasant parts. In the end, our sympathies may rest with Maggie and Mama, as they stand together in solidarity against Dee's encroaching arrogance and obvious contempt.




"You just don't understand," she said, as Maggie and I came out to the car.


"What don't I understand?" I wanted to know.


"Your heritage," she said, And then she turned to Maggie, kissed her, and said, "You ought to try to make something of yourself, too, Maggie. It's really a new day for us. But from the way you and Mama still live, you'd never know it."



Maggie smiled; maybe at the sunglasses. But a real smile, not scared. After we watched the car dust settle, I asked Maggie to bring me a dip of snuff. And then the two of us sat there just enjoying, until it was time to go in the house and go to bed.




`int_-4^4 3^(x/4) dx` Evaluate the definite integral

To evaluate the integral: `int_(-4)^(4) 3^(x/4) dx` , we follow the formula based from the  First Fundamental Theorem of Calculus: 


`int_a^bf(x)dx=F(b)- F(a)`


wherein  f is a continuous and F is the indefinite integral f on the closed interval [a,b].


Based on the given problem, the boundary limits are:


a =-4 and b=4


To solve for F as the indefinite integral of f, we follow the basic integration formula for an exponential function: 


`int a^u du = a^u/(ln(a))+C`


By comparison:` a^u `   vs     ` 3^(x/4)` , we let:


`a=3`   and   `u=x/4`   then   `du= 1/4dx` .


Rearrange` du= 1/4dx` into `4 du =dx` .


Apply u-substitution using `u =x/4` and `4du=dx` :


`int 3^(x/4) dx= int 3^u * 4du`


 Apply the basic properties of integration: `int c*f(x) dx= c int f(x) dx` .


 `int 3^u * 4du =4 int 3^u du`


Applying the formula: `int a^u du = a^u/(ln(a))` .


`4 int 3^u du= 4 *[ 3^u/(ln(3))]`


Express in terms of x using` u=x/4` :


`4 *[ 3^u/(ln(3))] =4 *[ 3^(x/4)/(ln(3))]`


Then indefinite integral function `F(x) =4 *[ 3^(x/4)/(ln(3))]`


Applying F(b) - F(a) with the closed interval [a,b] as [-4,4]:


`int_(-4)^(4) 3^(x/4) dx =4 *[ 3^((4)/4)/(ln(3))] -4 *[ 3^(-4/4)/(ln(3))]`


`=(4*3^(1))/(ln(3)) - (4 * 3^(-1))/(ln(3))`


`=(12)/(ln(3))-4/(3ln(3))`


`= (12 -4/3) *1/(ln(3))`


`= ((36)/3-4/3)*1/(ln(3))`


`= (32/3)*1/(ln(3))`   or  ` (32)/(3ln(3))` as the Final Answer.

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

In Catch-22, what is the balance of power between Yossarian and the chaplain?

Catch-22 opens with Yossarian’s reaction to meeting the chaplain:



It was love at first sight.


The first time Yossarian saw the chaplain he fell madly in love with him.



One might imagine that, due to the chaplain's status as a religious man and Yossarian's lovestruck state of mind, the balance of power would favor the chaplain. But contrary to the expectation of love at first sight, Yossarian describes his first impression as such:



Yossarian had no idea who he was and just took it for granted that he was either another doctor or another madman.



When under the impression that the chaplain is merely another officer, Yossarian is dismissive; however, upon realizing that the captain was also a chaplain, he is "astonished" and ecstatic. He is described as “[glowing] with affection” toward the chaplain, and calls him “sweet” after the chaplain had left. Perhaps the most telling line is this:



Yossarian wanted to help him.



In the first chapter, the balance of power clearly favors Yossarian. Although Captain Tappman is of equal rank and a chaplain as well, Yossarian feels himself superior to the chaplain and attempts to help him. Just as tellingly, the chaplain is described as flushing and blushing frequently throughout the encounter. His innocence is prominent: he "beamed gratefully" after Yossarian said he could visit him in the hospital.


Later in the book, the chaplain finds himself under Yossarian's protection. He sits with Yossarian and Dunbar at the officers club and feels safe, which he does not when alone. When Colonel Cathcart tries to throw him out, Yossarian "[rises] truculently to intervene" to throw an "avenging punch." 


As he is "sincerely a very helpful person who was never able to help anyone," the chaplain finds himself torn. He wants nothing more than to live quietly and return to his family, but he feels a sense of obligation to Yossarian. His attempt to talk to Major Major about the escalating number of missions fails; he believes himself to be the butt of a practical joke and with a "pleading whimper" escapes out the window. Particularly in comparison to Yossarian, who is, paradoxically, a brave coward, the chaplain appears far less resolved even as he attempts to aid him.


For all of his trepidation, the chaplain steps up when it is called for. Under suspicion of censoring letters under the name of Washington Irving, he recognizes Yossarian's handwriting and nonetheless refuses to give up his friend. After being punished for infractions he had never committed and accused of ridiculous crime, he is found guilty and told not the leave the island; in a "temper of scalding and vindictive resentment," he resolves to push the matter of the ever-growing number of missions. Though his attempt fails, it is growth regardless: the balance of power shifts in the chapter when the chaplain takes the fall for Yossarian and pushes for what is right.


In the hospital, the chaplain and Yossarian converse more as equals. The chaplain still blushes awkwardly, but Yossarian appears to value his opinion even though the chaplain didn't influence his decision: he had already planned not to take Cathcart and Korn's deal.


In the end, it is the chaplain's news that Orr has been washed ashore in Sweden that gives Yossarian the final push to leave. Yossarian, recognizing that Orr set up his escape deliberately, is jubilant; he calls on the chaplain to "for once in your life, succeed at something" and get him his uniform so that he can escape. Bolstered by Yossarian's confidence, the chaplain resolves to persevere in the face of Cathcart and Korn.


The power imbalance between Yossarian and the chaplain never reverses—Yossarian holds more sway throughout the relationship—but they both ultimately benefit from their friendship. While the chaplain is rarely able to aid Yossarian despite his dearest wishes to do so, he ultimately provides the catalyst for his escape; in turn, Yossarian gives him the gift of perseverance.

How does Atticus tolerate Mrs. Dubose in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Mrs. Dubose is a neighbor who lives on the same street as the Finch family. When Jem and Scout walk by her house, Mrs. Dubose shouts insults from her front porch. One day, Jem goes home angry after a series of insults from Mrs. Dubose. His father tells Jem to calm down and consider Mrs. Dubose.



She's an old lady and she's ill. You just hold your head high and be a gentleman. Whatever she says to you, it's your job not to let her make you mad (Chapter 11).



When Scout and Jem walk with their father, he greets Mrs. Dubose as they pass her house. He takes off his hat and greets her with a compliment.  


After Jem chops up Mrs. Dubose's camellias with Scout's baton, Atticus admonishes him. He tells his son that "to do something like this to a sick old lady is inexcusable." He recommends Jem apologize to her.


Atticus shows empathy toward Mrs. Dubose. She is a sick woman with a morphine addiction. Though she says unkind things about him, he shows her compassion. He also wants his children to show her compassion. Atticus tolerates Mrs. Dubose and her cantankerous ways because he sees her as a human being in need of compassion instead of a cranky old lady. He ignores the unkind things she says to him. He always treats her with respect and friendliness, no matter what she says.

Monday, June 25, 2012

Define the American dream. What roles does the American dream play in the novel "Of Mice and Men"?

In the 1930's, the setting of Steinbeck's novella, Of Mice and Men, the American Dream was defined as the opportunity to work hard and achieve the socio-economic level that a person seeks.



According to James Truslow Adams, who coined the phrase "American Dream" in 1931, the American Dream is simply for everyone to have equal opportunity to live a better and more prosperous life. [https://www.reference.com/history/american-dream-1930s-809757d5533c5a2a]



For the bindle stiffs of Steinbeck's narrative, the American Dream is simply to have a home and a good job that will provide financial comfort. Financial security is certainly a real dream during the Depression when men must  try to find jobs and meals each day, sometimes, or at least move from job to job.
The dream of owning a small farm with rabbits and gardens is clearly the hope for security and happiness for Lennie and George. This hope that the American Dream offers is what keeps them and others working and saving money in the hope of attaining certain goals.

Saturday, June 23, 2012

What should be the role of citizens in creating public policy?

There is really no one answer to this, as it is not a matter of fact but one of opinion. Different individuals and different cultures have different beliefs about this topic.


In some societies, such as ancient Athens, direct democracy was practiced with citizens voting directly on matters of public policy. On the positive side, this gives citizens a direct and immediate voice in the running of their state. On the negative side, this may only be practical for states containing a few thousand citizens. Also, there is a problem that the average citizen in not necessarily an expert on policy matters. Referendums such as those held in the state of California descend from this ideal. The problem, though, is that people can vote for such popular measures as reducing taxing and improving services separately, without addressing the problem that one cannot reduce revenue and increase spending without running up an unsustainable deficit. 


At the other extreme, countries such as modern China give the average citizen little voice in determining policy. The Chinese communist party would claim that this benefits the country as a whole in providing a expert, efficient, technocratic mode of government that can make and implement wise and impartial policies. On the negative side, though, autocracies become kleptocracies, with the wealthy and powerful forming an elite of billionaires while the average citizen remains impoverished and powerless.


Another possibility is representative government, which operates under the assumption that citizens can vote for people to represent them and to appoint able technocrats in a civil service. Most modern democracies operate this way. Representative government is a compromise between direct popular influence and technocracy in theory, but the same problem of lack of voter expertise arises. Any system in which people vote directly requires a well-funded, mandatory educational system so that voters can make informed choices.

Friday, June 22, 2012

How does Macbeth feel in Act 1, Scene 7?

Macbeth is worried that killing Duncan is not a good idea, but Lady Macbeth talks him into it.


Macbeth was ready to kill Duncan when he found out he was not named the king’s heir.  He was feeling very ambitious, since the witches told him he would be king.  However, when he returned home he was suddenly not so ready.  Killing the king suddenly seems like not such a good idea.


Macbeth is worried about the consequences of killing the king.



If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere well
It were done quickly: if the assassination
Could trammel up the consequence, and catch
With his surcease success; that but this blow
Might be the be-all and the end-all here,
But here, upon this bank and shoal of time,
We'ld jump the life to come. (Act 1, Scene 7)



He starts to sort of talk himself out of it.  He says in this soliloquy that Duncan is there at his castle “in double trust” because Macbeth is supposed to his loyal kinsman, and is also his host.  How can you kill your own kinsman, especially when he is visiting your house?  Macbeth points out that he should be protecting Duncan, not murdering him.  Duncan has been a good king.  He does not deserve to be killed.


When Lady Macbeth arrives, she doesn’t know what Macbeth’s problem is.  She tells him to be a man, and stop whining.  He is still worried about the risks, but she's not.



MACBETH


If we should fail?


LADY MACBETH


We fail!
But screw your courage to the sticking-place,
And we'll not fail. …(Act 1, Scene 7)



Macbeth is impressed with his wife’s resolve.  He agrees to do it, inspired by her fire.  He knows that she is a unique woman.  After all, what does he have to lose?  She laid out the entire plan.  All he has to do is follow it.

Why is Hamlet unhappy?

Shakespeare’s Hamlet unfolds with a melancholy environment, as the young Hamlet enters the stage troubled by the recent death of his father and marriage of his mother to his uncle Claudius.  Hamlet is greatly perturbed by the events as conveyed in his first exchange with Claudius:



Claudius: But now, my cousin Hamlet, and my son—
Hamlet: (aside) A little more than kin and less than kind.
Claudius: How is it that the clouds still hang on you?
Hamlet: Not so, my lord.  I am too much i’ the sun. (I. ii. 64-67)



In this exchange, Claudius refers to Hamlet as both cousin and son, which angers Hamlet. Hamlet says that Claudius is now “more than kin,” as he is now his stepfather, but quickly adds that Claudius is “less than kind.”  This is in part due to the fact that Claudius has so hastily married Gertrude, as Hamlet points out, “The funeral baked meats / Did coldly furnish forth the marriage tables” (I. ii. 179-180). 


Indeed, the death of his father and remarriage of his mother have a great effect on Hamlet, and he spends the majority of the play consumed with grief.  He explains:



'Tis not alone my inky cloak, good mother,
Nor customary suits of solemn black,
Nor windy suspiration of forced breath,
No, nor the fruitful river in the eye,
Nor the dejected 'havior of the visage,
Together with all forms, moods, shapes of grief,
That can denote me truly. These indeed “seem,”
For they are actions that a man might play.
But I have that within which passeth show,
These but the trappings and the suits of woe. (I. ii. 77-86)



In this passage, Hamlet explains that his mourning, dark clothes, weeping and sighs are just surface expressions of the true grief he feels.  He is truly angered and upset about his father’s death and mother’s hasty remarriage. He goes on to state, “Within a month, / Ere yet the salt of most unrighteous tears / Had left the flushing her galled eyes, / She married” (I. ii. 154-57).  In this hyperbole, Hamlet claims that his mother remarried before her tears over her husband’s death even dried.  He then states, “It is not nor it cannot come to good, / But break, my heart, for I must hold my tongue” (I. ii. 159-60).  Thus, Hamlet is unhappy because not only has his father died and his mother married his uncle, he cannot adequately express his melancholy or objection.  He therefore spends his time wandering around the castle in mourning clothes, contemplating the death of his great father and loathing the fact that his mother has so readily remarried.

To what extent is Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men a novel of protest?

Of Mice and Men is a novel of protest. Steinbeck portrays the plight of the working person in stark terms. George says at the beginning of the novel:




“Guys like us, that work on ranches, are the loneliest guys in the world. They got no fambly. They don’t belong no place. They come to a ranch an’ work up a stake and then they go into town and blow their stake, and the first thing you know they’re poundin’ their tail on some other ranch. They ain’t got nothing to look ahead to" (page numbers vary by edition).



George and Lennie's lifestyle illustrates the plight of the working class. Though they work hard, they have nothing to show for their work. Instead, they travel from place to place, and, though they want their own farm, it's doubtful that they will be able to accumulate enough money to purchase their own land.


The novel is also a form of protest against other forms of prejudice and a form of advocacy for the dispossessed. For example, Lennie is constantly misunderstood because he is developmentally disabled, and Candy, the old ranch hand, is treated with such little regard that Carlson, another ranch hand, wants Candy to shoot his beloved old dog. Candy is of little use on the ranch because his arm has been injured, and Steinbeck's sympathetic portrait of him is a means of protesting the poor treatment of the dispossessed and weak in our society. In addition to being a novel of protest, Of Mice and Men is also of literary value because it is eloquently written and speaks about timeless themes such as friendship, fairness, and love. 


What quotes suggest that Dogberry is a fool in Much Ado about Nothing?

Dogberry is used for comic relief in the play. As the constable he is supposed to be investigating the case of Don John, who viciously set up Hero and Claudio, but actually he is fairly incompetent. He believes that he is important, and that makes his goofy inadequacy all the funnier.


Consider the conversation between Dogberry and the watchman.



Why, you speak like an ancient and most quiet
watchman; for I cannot see how sleeping should
offend: only, have a care that your bills be not
stolen. Well, you are to call at all the
ale-houses, and bid those that are drunk get them to bed. (Act 3, Scene 3)



He says that if they can’t get the drunk men to bed, they should “let them alone till they are sober.” Dogberry often gets mixed up like this, not quite saying what he means to say.



One word, sir: our watch, sir, have indeed
comprehended two aspicious persons, and we would
have them this morning examined before your worship. (Act 3, Scene 5)



Obviously he does not mean “comprehended” but “apprehended” or caught. He also does not mean “auspicious” but “suspicious.” It is not even clear that Dogberry can count. Still, in the end Don John’s plan is found out. Dogberry may be useless, but he is harmless.


In a play about "nothing," Dogberry serves an important role. Despite the serious nature of the events, the play really is mostly a comedy. Dogberry breaks in when things may seem too serious to make the audience laugh. Like many of Shakespeare's clowns, he is completely sincere. Shakespeare loved wordplay, especially having characters like Dogberry use malapropisms, or the wrong words. The audience would get the joke and laugh through his scenes.

Thursday, June 21, 2012

In "Rikki-Tikki-Tavi," what is the relationship between Nag and Nagaina?

Rikki-Tikki-Tavi, or just Rikki-tikki as he is called throughout the story, is a mongoose in the eponymous story that is collected in Kipling's The Jungle Book. A mongoose is similar to a weasel, and they have a reputation as snake-killers. In this story, Rikki-tikki is pitted against Nag and Nagaina, a pair of cobras that are set on terrorizing the garden where Rikki-tikki and the other animals live, and ultimately driving off the human family that has adopted Rikki-tikki by killing their son, Teddy.


Shortly after she is introduced (via attempting to kill Rikki-tikki by sneaking up behind him), Nagaina is mentioned as being Nag's wife, and later his widow after Rikki-tikki kills Nag first. The cobras are shown to be equally cruel, vindictive and committed to the deaths of either Rikki-tikki or Teddy, and Rikki-tikki's fight with Nagaina is ultimately the more violent one because she forces him to fight her underground, where she has the advantage. Nevertheless, Rikki-tikki kills her as well, and the story concludes.

What advice does Lady Macbeth give Macbeth when he arrives home?

When Macbeth arrives at their home, Lady Macbeth tells him, "To beguile the time, / Look like the time.  Bear welcome in your eye, / Your hand, your tongue" (1.5.74-76).  Macbeth looks too guilty, so she tells him that in order to deceive everyone, he's going to have to look more normal.  He must graciously and hospitably welcome the king and his retinue to the Macbeths' home in every way that he would typically do so: in his looks, in what he offers them, in how he speaks to them.  


Further, she says, "Look like th' innocent / flower, / But be the serpent under 't" (1.5.76-77).  In other words, then, Macbeth needs to appear to be as harmless and simple as a flower, a symbol of good feeling, but actually act as the concealed snake underneath.  Because of the story of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, snakes are often symbolic of evil (because the snake in the garden was really the Devil in disguise).  Therefore, Lady Macbeth wants Macbeth to deceive the king and everyone else so that their suspicion does not alight on the couple.  

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

How did the Phoenicians contribute greatly to written communication?

The Phoenicians made a significant contribution to writing by developing the first alphabet. Other countries either borrowed or modified their own alphabet based on the Phoenician alphabet. Phoenician words can be seen in the writing of other groups of people. The Greeks, Romans, Egyptians and Hebrews all are examples of groups of people that have evidence of some Phoenician words in their writings.


The Phoenician alphabet consisted of 22 letters. There are no vowels. The Phoenician writing system is read from the right to the left. The same is true for Phoenician numerals.


The Phoenician writing system is evident in parts of the Old Testament. Since there were no other viable writing systems at the same, the Phoenician alphabet was used to transliterate the Old Testament.


The Phoenician alphabet and writing system was used as the basis of the writing system for many other groups of people.

How can I analyze Torvald Helmer's insulting attitude toward Nora in Ibsen's play A Doll's House?

Ibsen's play A Doll's House is set in the late 1800s. It is not a time when women were encouraged to be independent in thought, action or self-expression. While many people viewed the play as a "call to arms" for the feminist movement, the author insists that such was never his intention. However, as with most forms of art, once a creation leaves the creator's hands, it takes on a new life of its own, based upon individual perceptions.


Nora is a woman who was coddled in her home growing up by her father, and then directed and controlled as Torvald's wife. Nora is relatively naive, as seen in her fraudulent act of forging her father's signature on a loan (while her father was dying)—justifying her actions because she had to save Torvald's life. Because he was desperately ill, she had no concern for the law...family was more important.


Torvald controls Nora almost completely, but Nora is clever enough to know that if she plays the child, she can get whatever she needs. Torvald is so full of himself that he does not credit his wife with much intelligence at all, and cares only for himself his status and success. Of Nora's behavior...



It is true that [Nora] does behave like a child sometimes in her relations with her husband. She pouts, wheedles, and chatters because Torvald expects these things; he would not love his wife without them. 



In that Torvald bases his relationship with his wife not on love but on acceptable behavior, the reader is able to see more deeply into his character, aware that he has little or no respect for her as a person. The name of the play reflects Torvald's practice and desire to manipulate his wife as a child would a toy figure in a dollhouse. 


Torvald has no forward-thinking attitudes about women's rights. In his mind, women are there for their husband and children. It is their "sacred duty." He is not alone: society as a whole felt the same way. Women did not make decisions. They could not own property and they were not allowed to take loans. They were not even permitted to obtain a university education. And only poor women were allowed to work; a respectable woman's profession was wife, housekeeper and mother. As such, women were seen as possessions. This is obvious in Torvald's comment about Nora the night of the party they attend upstairs:



Nora: Torvald, don't look at me like that!


Torvald: Can't I look at my richest treasure? At all that beauty that's mine, mine alone—completely and utterly.



That Nora's father and husband have treated her similarly indicates the norm within society to oversee women and control them: whether daughter or wife.


Nora does not deserve Torvald's disrespect or insulting attitudes. She is naive, but relatively smart. Years before the doctors told them that in order to recover from a serious illness, Torvald needed to travel to a better climate: Italy. In order to replay Krogstad for the money she borrowed (of which Torvald is totally unaware), she rations the allowance her husband gives her for housekeeping and clothing. Some secretly goes to Krogstad. She also takes on work without her husband's knowledge to repay the debt.


The acceptable mindset of this male-dominated society explains Torvald's ease in behaving as he does. When he discovers her illegal actions, he cares not at all that she saved his life. His focus is on what people will think. He berates her.



Oh, what an awful awakening...she who was my pride and joy—a hypocrite, a liar—worse, worse—a criminal! How infinitely disgusting it all is! The shame! [...] Now you've wrecked all my happiness—ruined my whole future...I'll be swept down miserably into the depths on account of a featherbrained woman.



Then he announces, "...you can't be allowed to bring up the children." Nora quietly takes in all he has to say.


When the threat of exposure has passed, Torvald can only see how he has been saved. While he has been ranting, Nora has had an awakening of her own. Her marriage is built not on love, but upon Torvald's control of every aspect of her existence. With a frozen look on her face, Torvald says he understands that she cannot grasp the idea that he has forgiven her! Able to be honest for the first time, she sarcastically thanks him for his forgiveness.


When Nora calls her husband to task for treating her like a toy doll, she observes:



Our home has been nothing but a playroom. I have been your doll-wife, just as at home I was papa's doll-child; and here the children have been my dolls.



As Nora leaves the room to change her costume, it is as if she is removing "dress up" clothes. The woman she has been for all these years, repressed and controlled, has now surfaced to freedom for the first time in her life.


When Torvald notes that he does not understand her or her new demeanor, she replies that he has never understood her; but neither has she truly understood him. As much as she has played the role of a doll, he has acted out the societal norms of society. At that time, society made little place for a woman that did not fit into the realm of service and subservience. Nora's change demonstrates her transformation, striking out against the control men have long exercised over women.


Torvald is a product of his breeding and training. His focus is on himself and his place of power and respect in the world of his peers—all men of his status. A follower rather than a visionary, Torvald is perfectly happy to allow the status quo to prevail. Seeing his wife (or any woman) on equal footing does not even occur to him. With the knowledge that Torvald does not have the capacity at that time to be anything other than he is, Nora packs her bags and leaves.

What are five words used to describe Margot in "All Summer in a Day" by Ray Bradbury?

Five words that have been used to describe the character Margot in Ray Bradbury's "All Summer in a Day" are the following: frail, lost, different, pale, and thinness.


Margot is a frail girl who, unlike the other children on Venus, has lived on earth and is the only one in her class who has actually seen the sun. And, because she has known a world where it does not rain constantly under a grey sky, she is terribly unhappy. Having once reacted emotionally to this deprivation of sunlight as she refused to enter the shower rooms at school, screaming lest the water touch her, Margot marks herself as different and lost in a world that is not her own. After this incident, there are rumors of her parents' having to send her back to earth. 



And so, the children hated her for all these reasons of big and little consequence. They hated her pale snow face, her waiting silence, her thinness, and her possible future....They knew her difference and kept away.



They also hate Margot because of her having seen and experienced what they have never seen, and she has written a beautiful poem about it. Hating her for this privilege over them, one of the boys suggests that nothing is going to happen on this particular day, despite Margot's insistence that the scientists have said the sun is to come out. Nevertheless, Margot persists in her conviction about the sun's appearing. So, the brutish children catch her and shove her into a closet, locking the door.


When the sun does emerge, these cruel children delight in the experience; it is only after the rains return that any one remembers that Margot is locked away, deprived of that which she has so desperately longed to see.

In the poem "The Hero," which literary devices and figures of speech used are significant?

The style and language of "The Hero" mimic real speech and natural, straightforward language, so we won't find the kind of dramatic, elevated literary devices or figures of speech that we do in grander war poems. In fact, the diction in the poem is so simple and understated that you won't find a word longer than three syllables! Throughout the poem, we're mostly noticing the subtle powers of short, clipped words found in colloquial discourse. Let's take a look at the important instances of figurative language that we do find in this poem:


1. Subtle onomatopoeia. Words like "choke," "coughed," and "mumbled" all lightly suggest the sound of what they indicate, which adds realism to the poem. It's this realism that brings the topic of war down from the lofty heights of other poems. The event depicted in the poem is an everyday one. So, the grief it conveys is real, something readers can personally identify with.


2. Imagery. Readers envision the mother's "bowed" face and her "white hair." These simple images express the mother's weakened, despondent state. Note the distinct lack of any heavy-handed imagery.


3. Subtle alliteration. The meaning behind the slightly alliterative phrase in the second stanza, "Because he'd been so brave," is absolutely destroyed by its counterpart in the alliterative phrase from the third stanza: "Blown to small bits." Here we see Sassoon's intention to reject the patriotic notion that dying in battle is somehow majestic and noble.

Why would Samneric be the best candidates for being chief on the island? What evidence from the text supports this idea?

The characteristics Sam and Eric, the twins, possess that could make them a good chief (or good co-chiefs) are their cheerfulness, their willingness to work, their values, and their compassion. When they first appear in chapter 1, they throw themselves down, grinning and panting like dogs, their "cheery duplication" a pleasant surprise. They get the crowd of boys to laugh. Samneric don't seem to mind working hard, as long as they can do it together. They carry the slain pig between them on their shoulders in chapter 4; in chapter 8 when all the biguns except Piggy and themselves have deserted Ralph, they sneak away with Piggy and present a huge array of fruit to Ralph to cheer him up. They also work very hard on the fire in chapter 10 before they realize the job is just too big for only three people. 


Samneric display good values for the most part, staying loyal to Ralph until they are kidnapped by Jack. They have the perception to realize that Jack's way isn't right; when Ralph mentions getting taken prisoner "by the Reds," Eric and Sam say that would be better than getting taken by Jack's group. When they do get kidnapped by Jack, they warn Ralph, telling him that Jack and Roger are "terrors."


Finally, Samneric show compassion toward Ralph after Piggy's death when no one else will. They try to warn him of Jack's plans, and they pass him some meat. They end up being beaten for that.


Although Samneric have good qualities, like cheerfulness, willingness to work hard, moral values, and compassion, they nevertheless have some qualities that would interfere with their success as chief. First, they are too dependent on each other and because of that are a liability to the group; Piggy points out to Ralph that the two of them only take one turn at the fire and that isn't fair. Second, they tend to be easily frightened. They retreat from Jack in fear when he first paints himself, they obey him when he takes them away from the fire to hunt the pig in chapter 4, and they race down the mountain in terror when they see the dead parachutist. In the end, they give away Ralph's hiding place to Jack when he physically punishes them. 


Samneric have some good character traits, making them a better choice for chief than many of the other boys, but they also have qualities that would detract from their ability to lead.

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

What does John think when he hears that Kit has been visiting Hannah in The Witch of Blackbird Pond?

John Holbrook believes that Kit should not hang out with Hannah Tupper because she is a Quaker and has a reputation as a witch. 


John Holbrook is a friend of Kit’s.  She met him on the ship on the way to Wethersfield.  He was coming to study with Dr. Reverend Bulkeley.  He often comes to the Wood house, where Kit loves to listen to him read aloud.  She knows that Judith is interested in him, and Mercy actually is too. 


When she makes friends with Hannah Tupper, the old woman who leaves in the meadow by Blackbird Pond, she knows most people will not approve.  They do not like her because she does not come to Meeting, and because she does not associate with them at all.  This is why they call her a witch. 


Kit does value John’s opinion, but she fears Dr. Bulkeley’s influence. 



Probably, she concluded now, it would do no good to ask John about Hannah Tupper. Whatever Dr. Bulkeley thought about Quakers, John would think so too. (Ch. 10) 



One day Kit is walking back from Hannah Tupper’s house, and she runs into John Holbrook.  He asks why she is walking alone, and she tells him that she has been with Hannah.  He asks if her family knows, and she says that Judith and Mercy knew, and that Hannah is a good friend of hers. 


When John objects that Hannah is a Quaker, she asks him if that matters. 



"Yes, I think it does," he said thoughtfully. "Not that I hold anything against the Quakers. But this woman has no proper reputation. She's been accused twice of practicing witchcraft."


"That's just cruel gossip."


"Probably, but I'd hate to see it turned against you too. (Ch. 13) 



Kit tells him that witchcraft is silly.  John starts to quote Dr. Bulkeley, but Kit doesn’t want to hear that.  She thinks that John relies too much on what Dr. Bulkeley thinks.

Monday, June 18, 2012

How does George Eliot vividly portray Silas Marner's despair after losing his gold in Silas Marner?

When Silas Marner first sees the empty hole where his gold has been, his "heart leap[s] violently," as he cannot believe the gold is gone. He tries to control his terror. But, when he despairs of hope, Marner's hands tremble, he screams, and he cries in desolation. He then totters to his loom in order to assure himself of some reality. 


As Marner's realization that his gold is missing sinks into him, he is absolutely devastated, as his life revolves around this gold alone. In Chapter V, when Silas Marner returns to his cottage which has never been disturbed during his twelve-year residency, he enters and places his candle "unsuspectingly" on the floor by his loom. But, when he sees the empty hole in his floor, Marner feels his heart "leap violently." Yet, there is a suspension of belief that this gold is really gone. He feels terror because it has been solely his gold that



...gathered his power of loving together into a hard isolation like its own.



Marner's gold has been the one joy in his life. In a ritual every night, he waits until he has his supper before he counts the gold, but he places the bags upon his table before him as he eats--



For joy is the best of wine, and Silas's guineas were a golden wine of that sort. 



In his temporary suspension of the truth, Marner looks around again, hoping that he may have missed seeing his bags of gold, but they are not visible anywhere. He again puts his hands to his head and brings forth from his heart "a wild ringing scream, the cry of desolation." After this, he sits at his loom, his "strongest assurance of reality."
Finally, the possibility that a thief has taken it comes to Marner and with it the hope that this thief can be caught. He does not desire that the thief be punished, either; he just wants his gold returned to him. For, the loss of his gold has "left his soul like a forlorn traveler on an unknown desert."

In Tangerine, what does Paul think about Mike's tree?

We know very little about what Paul thinks of Mike's tree. The only thing we know for sure is that Paul thinks it's "good" that Mike Costello has his own tree that stands as a memorial to him:



"I thought to myself, Mike Costello has his tree, and that's good."



As Paul views the tree, he mentally describes it as "a big laurel oak" that appears acceptably strong and healthy. Paul also notes the stakes and wires set up to hold the tree in place. They're a temporary support system, his dad explains, that will be removed once the tree is strong enough to stand on its own. And that's when Paul offers his thoughts about Mike's tree being "good."


If we read between the lines a little, we can infer that Paul considers the tree an appropriate memorial for Mike. It stands on school property, right there on the front lawn where no one could miss it--possibly an appropriate spot, to Paul's way of thinking, given Mike's popularity and strong personality in life. However, we're still making inferences here; again, Paul only acknowledges that the tree is "good."


This brief scene takes place at the very end of the novel, in the chapter titled "Wednesday, December 6."

Sunday, June 17, 2012

How can I compare and contrast the behavioral or human relations approach and the classical approach to management?

The classical and behavioral approaches to management (the latter has also been called the "human relations" approach and the "neoclassical" approach; these are all basically the same thing, though some people consider the "human relations" form to be an older version whereas "behavioral" is the modern method) are similar in many ways. Both are intended to optimize productivity of workers, and hence profitability of companies. They both assume a hierarchy of managers over workers in which managers tell workers what they should do, and of course they both assume the context of a capitalist economy where companies own capital, hire workers, and make profits. (It's important to remember that neither of those things are actually a given; worker-owned co-ops are quite common in many places, and for most of history most of the world has not been capitalist.)

But the classical approach is extremely hierarchical; that is essentially its defining feature. The whole structure is based around ensuring discipline and an orderly chain of command. You have clearly defined objectives, quotas to meet, and rewards and punishments tied directly to whether or not you fulfill those objectives. By design, managers are not supposed to be friendly with their workers, as this is "unprofessional" and could undermine discipline. Rules must be followed exactly, and if they aren't, the punishment must be swift and severe. The place you'll see the classical approach used the most nowadays is actually the military---though even they are starting to figure out its shortcomings.

The behavioral approach relaxes the hierarchy a little bit, without eliminating it entirely. Based on empirical research showing that happy and motivated workers perform better (managers aren't doing this out of the goodness of their hearts, for the most part; they expect higher profits to result), the behavioral approach involves providing workers with a pleasant, friendly environment and much heavier focus on teamwork and cooperation rather than cooperation and individual rewards.

The behavioral approach also encourages feedback from workers to managers about what is working and what isn't, making the system more flexible to change and better at improving itself when things go wrong. Whereas a classical manager would punish criticism as insubordination, a behavioral manager would try to understand the criticism, and either implement the proposed changes or at least do something to address the problems that the workers noticed.

Classical management also involves a lot more direct monetary incentives (e.g. a commission on sales or a bonus for exceeding quota), whereas behavioral management emphasizes non-monetary incentives (e.g. "Employee of the Month" and praise for a job well done). These tend to be cheaper for the company and can be just as motivating for workers, though it's legitimate to ask whether it is fair to workers for managers to reap all the monetary gains while workers just get a pat on the back.

Why is Mattie biten by a mosquito in the opening chapter? What might this foreshadow?

Matilda "Mattie" Cook is a young girl living in Philadelphia with her mother and grandfather if 1793. In the first chapter, which takes place on August 16th, Mattie wakes up on a very hot morning with a mosquito buzzing around her ear.


This opening scene provides significant foreshadowing of the events that are about to occur throughout the rest of the book. It is not long before Mattie's mother, Lucille, falls ill, as well as Mattie herself. The sickness they are afflicted with is Yellow fever, a viral disease which results in serious symptoms, including bleeding, kidney issues, fever, chills, muscle pains, and even death. It is spread through the bites of infected mosquitoes.


To provide a bit of context of how serious this epidemic was, consider that in Philadelphia (a city of 50,000 people in 1793), at least 5,000 individuals died. This is one of the worst outbreaks in the history of the United States.

Why is the story about the mad dog important in Chapter 10 of Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird?

The incident of the mad dog in Chapter 10 of Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird is important because it gives the reader a chance to see the fearlessness of Atticus's character, as well as his tenacity to uphold his moral principles.

Chapter 10 opens with Scout complaining about Atticus's character. She informs the reader that both she and Jem saw him as "feeble," due to his age--"nearly fifty." As a result of his age, Atticus does not do anything interesting such as play tackle football. Even his job is boring. In the eyes of Scout, Atticus doesn't do anything worthy of praise:



Our father didn't do anything. He worked in an office, not a drugstore. Atticus did not drive a dump-truck for the county, he was not the sheriff, he did not farm, work in a garage, or do anything that could possibly arouse the admiration of anyone. (Ch. 10)



What's more, Atticus doesn't even do the things the fathers of their classmates do such as hunt, fish, play poker, drink, or smoke. Yet, the events that follow in Chapter 10 give the children a chance to see their father in a new light.

When Sheriff Tate and Atticus arrive at the news of a mad dog on the street, the sheriff carrying his rifle, they are not surprised to see Atticus encourage Sheriff Tate to shoot the dog as soon as it comes into shooting range. However, they are surprised to see Sheriff Tate hand the rifle to Atticus and say, "Take him, Mr. Finch." At first Atticus refuses, but Sheriff Tate reminds him it is a "one-shot job." Since the dog is standing in front of the Radleys' gate, a misfired bullet could wind up in the Radleys' house, and Sheriff Tate knows he can't shoot as well as Atticus. Soon enough, Atticus relents, and Scout and Jem feel they are "in a fog" as they watch their father "walk out into the middle of the street," swiftly take aim, and shoot the dog.

Later, Miss Maudie explains that the reason why he gave up shooting and never speaks of his talent of marksmanship is because he realized "God had given him an unfair advantage over most living things."

Hence, this instance tells us several things about Atticus's character. First, it tells he is an extremely brave man. Second, it tells us he has a deep respect for life, even the life of a dog. His deep respect for life is what made him refuse to take the shot at first. His deep respect for life is also what drives him to put his all into defending Tom Robinson. Third, the incident tells us that Atticus is willing to set aside his principles and reservations for the sake of the greater good, such as protecting his entire neighborhood, just as he is able to act to protect Robinson by defending him.

How were the Jews stripped away from their families in Night by Elie Wiesel?

In Elie's case, his family is separated at Birkenau, the reception center to the Nazi concentration camp at Auschwitz. As soon as the Jews from Sighet disembark the train they are divided by gender with the women and girls going to the left and men and boys to the right. Elie comments that he was parting from his mother and youngest sister "forever." They probably perished in the crematory that same night. At this point Elie and his father are still together, much to Elie's comfort, but at every step throughout the book they are in danger of being separated. In fact, the two are lucky to survive the initial "selection" (being selected meant certain death) since Elie is only fifteen at the time and his father fifty. They receive some important advice from an unknown man who tells them to alter their ages when they come before Dr. Mengele. Several times in the book, Elie is close to losing his father to a selection, yet the two are able to stay together almost until the end of the war. Unfortunately, Elie's father dies from dysentery at Buchenwald, only a short time before that camp was liberated.


Jews may also have been separated at the time of deportation as was the case of Stein, Elie's relative from Antwerp. Stein reports that he was deported by the Nazis in 1942 but his wife and children stayed behind in Belgium. To calm the man, Elie lies about his mother having received news from Antwerp that Stein's wife and children were doing fine. In reality, it is almost certain that they perished in a concentration camp in the same manner as Elie's mother and sister. Luckily for Elie, his two oldest sisters did survive the war and they were eventually reunited in a French orphanage. 

Saturday, June 16, 2012

I need help writing a paper in response to the following assignment sheet: This week, you will discuss the overall framework for human resources...

Your first task in writing this paper is to decide upon an appropriate change. Think about whether your company has made changes that affect human resources such as outsourcing work, hiring more contractors, allowing people to telecommute, or some other change that falls under the purview of HR. 


Once you have selected the change you will be discussing, you will need to write an introductory paragraph. Your first sentence should be a thesis statement indicating the degree to which the change was effective. For example:



XYZ company recently achieved substantial cost savings by outsourcing its call center, but at the cost of increased customer dissatisfaction. 



The rest of your introduction should explain how you will support your thesis in the rest of your paper. 


The second section of this paper should cover whether the change you are describing was a proactive or reactive one. The subsequent three sections should be divided so that each section is related to one of the three core competencies. 


You should conclude by evaluating the effectiveness of the change from an HR perspective. In other words, rather than just looking at costs, you should also look at its effect on company culture and morale, employee turnover, recruiting, and other HR issues. 

Friday, June 15, 2012

What color is the trophy and what does this mean in "Death of a Salesman?"

In the stage directions at the beginning of the play, Miller specifies that "a silver athletic trophy" stands on a shelf above Willy's bed. The color specified for the trophy has several possible meanings related to the theme of the play. One might think that a silver trophy could signify coming in second rather than coming in first, which would be a gold medal or trophy. However, that doesn't seem to correlate well with the ideas in the play. The trophy was a first-place trophy; Biff, as captain of his high school football team, led his team to be the "All-Scholastic Championship Team of the City of New York" when they won the big game at Ebbets Field. 


What's notable is that the trophy that Biff won is displayed in Willy's bedroom. Biff's success is Willy's "silver lining." Even if Willy is dissatisfied with his own skills and feels "kind of temporary" about himself, he clings to the hope that Biff will be a star. That was true when Biff was in high school, and it is still true years later. Willy is upset about Biff's failures and begins to calm down when he thinks Biff may get a loan from Bill Oliver to start a company. 


Silver can also have the connotation of betrayal, as in "thirty pieces of silver," the price Judas Iscariot received for betraying Jesus. Biff feels betrayed by Willy because Willy has been unfaithful to his wife and Biff caught him in the act. Willy also feels betrayed by Biff because Biff didn't go to college and make something of himself. Willy feels Biff has failed just to spite him and that he has betrayed the promise of success represented by the trophy.


Finally, and most importantly, silver represents the glittery, shiny, get-rich-quick American Dream that Willy has been pursuing his whole adult life. Rather than devoting himself to substantive pursuits--doing things with his life that will make the world a better place--Willy wants to succeed based on likability. He taught his boys to value popularity over hard work and serious training. Willy has a glamorized view of success: the elderly salesman who makes a living without ever having to leave his room, just because he is well loved. Willy says to Ben, "A man can end with diamonds here on the basis of being liked!" Chasing after the shiny thing keeps Willy from focusing on the things that truly matter. The silver trophy (in reality, probably painted plastic) represents the tantalizing prospect of achieving success without integrity and hard work--a prospect that does not live up to its promise. 

Thursday, June 14, 2012

In "The Lottery," what kind of work do they do in the village?

In Shirley Jackson's 1948 short story, "The Lottery," the villagers have many jobs. The setting of the story is a small village of three hundred people. In this village, there is a town square, a post office, and a bank. Villagers who run these operations are never named. In the third paragraph of the story, the narrator states: 



"Soon the men began to gather, surveying their own children, speaking of planting and rain, tractors and taxes. They stood together, away from the pile of stones in the corner, and their jokes were quiet and they smiled rather than laughed. The women, wearing faded house dresses and sweaters, came shortly after their menfolk."



Although not directly stated, one can infer from this passage that many of the village men are farmers. Their conversation about planting and tractors provides textual evidence for this. A further inference could be made that most of the women are homemakers, based not only on their attire in this passage but also on later conversations. Tessie Hutchinson tells her husband she had to finish washing the dishes in the sink before she could come to the lottery. 


There are only two people in the story whose jobs are named. Mr. Graves, the postmaster, serves as an assistant to the man who conducts the lottery. The other person whose job is named is Mr. Summers. He is the owner of a coal business in the village and the one who conducts the lottery. The fact that he is the only villager whose career is named speaks to the hierarchy in the town, as well. Mr. Summers conducts all the civic activities of the town because he has "the time and energy to do so." Since he is a business owner, he employs people but doesn't have to do the heavy work himself. He is a leader in a town of blind followers. 

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

In The Great Gatsby, would you rather live in East Egg or West Egg? The North-East or the Mid-West? Why?

According to Nick, the people of the Midwest are much more down to earth. And given all the lying and deceitful behavior he experienced in the Northeast, Nick would characterize the Midwest as a more honest place. So, these are the benefits of living in the Midwest. By contrast, the Northeast (the city in particular) is more complicated but also more exciting. Nick calls the area of the two eggs "one of the strangest areas in North America." Clearly, there is a fascination for Nick. However, he does eventually long for the honesty of his native Midwest. If it was a choice between honesty (Midwest) and excitement (Northeast), I would most often take honesty. So would Nick. 


Nick lives in West Egg, the "least fashionable" of the two. Daisy and Tom live in East Egg. The glamour of East Egg is tempting but the social world seems to be quite elitist and superficial. If we just use Tom and Daisy as representatives of the area, we have to philandering people who are obsessed with money. And if we take Nick and Gatsby to represent West Egg, we have an honest man and a dishonest, yet romantically idealistic man. Again, based upon the character of the people Nick gets to know, West Egg (like the Midwest) emerges as a more genuine place. In the end, suppose the question is: Would you rather live next door to a man like Gatsby or Tom Buchanan? For all of his flaws, I think most people would pick the dreamer (Gatsby) over the racist adulterer (Tom) any day. 

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

To what extent did the role of women change as a result of the Second World War?

Unmarried middle-class women had been entering the workforce in larger numbers in the years before World War II, and of course the war itself created a massive demand for labor that women stepped up to fill. They took jobs in heavy industry that had previously been closed to women, and while they still received lower pay than men who did the same jobs, they were indispensable to the industrial machine that helped to win World War II. After the war, however, the expectation was that women, especially married women, would return to more traditional roles. Many, of course, did, but many women also stayed in the workforce, though not in many of the jobs they had formerly held. Many women also entered college, though they struggled to find professional jobs upon graduation, and the social expectation to get married and start a family proved hard to resist for many. While demographic data show that more women worked during this period, culturally, the role of women as homemakers and mothers dominated postwar society. Advertisers, television programs, and even social scientists emphasized the domestic role of women, even as more and more women found this role confining (not to mention financially unrealistic). The 1960s marked the beginning of a focused movement for women's rights, one that is often traced to the publication of The Feminine Mystique by Betty Friedan in 1963. Friedan, who would become a founder of the National Organization for Women (NOW), argued that the gender roles prescribed for women in postwar society had left them unfulfilled, and that they needed more out of life to be emotionally satisfied.  She argued, in effect, that postwar changes had been bad for women, who ought to feel free to pursue other opportunities. 

How is the theme of glory portrayed in Julius Caesar?

In ancient Rome, ambition was the pursuit of glory and honor. The primary way to achieve these traits was through military leadership in conquest. In fact, failure to achieve glory usually resulted in the honorable path of suicide.


Julius Caesar achieved glory through his military conquests of Gaul (modern France). He expanded Roman control beyond present-day Italy to the rest of Europe. Often, defeated enemies were brought back to Rome and paraded through the streets in what was termed a “triumph,” a parade of victory for the glory of the victor. Because Julius Caesar was the sole leader left of the First Triumvirate, he was the focus of much attention. This disturbed the Senate, who feared a military conquest of Rome. Dictatorships were a common practice, but they were temporary, lasting only six months. They were afraid that Julius Caesar was ambitious in the worst sense, feeding off the adulation of the public and making himself the sole emperor of Rome. Therefore, Brutus and Cassius believed their path to glory and honor was the assassination of Caesar, thus saving Rome from the dissolution of the Republic. Their actions, however, paved the way for Octavius to establish himself as Caesar Augustus, the first emperor of the Roman Empire, which would last another five hundred years.

Monday, June 11, 2012

What was the significance of the exploits of Christopher Columbus?

Christopher Columbus made four voyages across the Atlantic Ocean for Spain. The Spanish sponsored his explorations in hopes of finding a shorter route to Asia. Columbus believed it might be possible to find a shorter route to Asia by heading west. The King and Queen of Spain also hoped he would find valuable minerals that would enhance Spain's treasury. Spain also hoped to spread Christianity to the places he would find. His voyages were significant.


As a result of Columbus's voyages, Europeans began to increase their interest in the Americas. It should be noted that Columbus didn’t discover the Americas, but he prompted many explorations to the Americas by the European colonial powers. European countries eventually set up colonies in the Americas. These explorations eventually led to the discovery of many minerals that greatly benefited the European countries. There also was an increase in trade between Europe and the Americas. The people who lived in the Americas suffered greatly as a result of these explorations. Europeans brought diseases that killed many of the native people because they had no immunities to these illnesses. The Europeans also enslaved some of the native people and took away their land.

Why, In Lord Of The Flies, are the boys on the island?

One can infer from the text that the boys were a group of British schoolchildren. They had been evacuated from their country during a devastating atomic war. The evacuation seems to have been an emergency procedure since it was clear that they had been taken directly from their schools because they were all still dressed in their uniforms, or as with Jack and his choirboys, in their choirboy attire, as suggested by the following extracts from chapter one:



Though he had taken off his school sweater and trailed it now from one hand, his grey shirt stuck to him and his hair was plastered to his forehead. 


Some were naked and carrying their clothes; others half-naked, or more or less dressed, in school uniforms, grey, blue, fawn, jacketed, or jerseyed. There were badges, mottoes even, stripes of color in stockings and pullovers.


Shorts, shirts, and different garments they carried in their hands; but each boy wore a square black cap with a silver badge on it. Their bodies, from throat to ankle, were hidden by black cloaks which bore a long silver cross on the left breast and each neck was finished off with a ham-bone frill.



The evacuation itself seems to have gone smoothly but the plane developed problems because it had been hit during an attack whilst flying to a safe haven, as suggested by Piggy:



“We was attacked!”


“When we was coming down I looked through one of them windows. I saw the other part of the plane. There were flames coming out of it.”



The pilot was forced to make a crash-landing on the island, believed to be located somewhere in the Pacific, as suggested by Jack's references when he speaks of Simon:



“He’s always throwing a faint,” said Merridew. “He did in Gib.; and Addis; and at matins over the precentor.”



'Gib.' is a clear reference to Gibraltar and 'Addis' refers to Addis Ababa, whilst 'matins over the precentor' was Jack's attempt at humor, obviously only understood by the choirboys who sniggered at his remark.


The plane skidded onto the island, leaving a huge scar. It was later dragged into the sea in a massive storm to then disappear forever.


There was a suggestion by Piggy that some boys could still have been on the plane when it was dragged out to sea.



“That storm dragged it out to sea. It wasn’t half dangerous with all them tree trunks falling. There must have been some kids still in it.”



The boys were stranded on the island without any adult supervision and they had to find a way to not only take care of themselves but also figure out how to get rescued.

Sunday, June 10, 2012

What are five of the major events in the plot that happened in Brave New World?

The best way to identify important points in a narrative is to use Freytag's Pyramid, a literary theory developed by a German analyst. He theorized, and proved, that the majority of literature (written and oral) tracks along the same narrative structure. Aldous Huxley's novel Brave New World does not vary from this framework, as one can see below: 


Inciting Incident: This is the moment in a narrative in which the conflict is initiated and begins to move the plot forward. In Brave New World, this is when Bernard and Lenina discover John living on the reservation. 


Rising Action: While the rising action is in fact a series of incidents, perhaps the most noteworthy incident in John's conflict with the society of the new world is his first experience with the batches of lower caste children who visit the hospital to become desensitized to death. However, one could also argue that his altercations with Lenina fit this category far better. 


Climax: The climactic moment, or point of highest tension, in John's conflict with the new world is seemingly far less dramatic than one might expect. This takes place during his debate with Mustapha Mond, during which each character defends his way of life. 


Falling Action: John's removal from the society to the remote barn begins to separate him from the conflict, which leads the reader to the conclusion. 


Resolution: John's suicide concludes the narrative arc and resolves the conflict within the novel. 

Saturday, June 9, 2012

How does Kino's perspective change throughout The Pearl?

In the beginning, Kino places great hope on the pearl, believing that it will change his future and that of his family. He believes that this will give him some freedom that he never knew he did not have. He was perfectly content before finding the pearl, but after his discovery he realizes that there are some things that will make his life (and those of his wife and child) much better. He begins to experience discontent. When he goes to the pearl merchants, he becomes cynical and skeptical, sure that they will try to cheat him (as indeed they do). He is not content with the price they offer. His discontent increases; the merchants in the city will give him a better price. He distrusts his wife, believing that she is trying to take the pearl away from him. More and more he doubts the honesty of those around him. All his trust is in the pearl, not in those around him, even those he loves. In the end, Kino loses his child and willingly gives up the pearl. It will not return his child to him, but he recognizes that it is the pearl that has brought such discontent into his life. His perspective has gone from contentedness and happiness to sorrow, doubt, and loss. He will not be able to regain all that he has lost; he hopes for merely a return to his simple life.

In "A Retrieved Reformation" by O. Henry, what does Ben Price represent to Jimmy Valentine?

Ben Price is Jimmy's nemesis. Jimmy would have no problems in the world if it were not for Ben Price, the detective. Jimmy has become so successful at his profession as a safecracker, so adept, so notorious, that someone had to devote his attention to catching and convicting him. Price was the man responsible for sending Jimmy to the prison, where we first meet him. When Jimmy gets his release from the warden and returns to his rented room the next day



Everything was just as he had left it. There on the floor was still Ben Price's collar-button that had been torn from that eminent detective's shirt-band when they had overpowered Jimmy to arrest him.



It is because of his fear of Ben Price that Jimmy makes the fateful decision to move clear out of his present sphere of operations, assume a new identity as Ralph Spencer, and establish a shoe business in a small town as a "front." He has been made to realize that too many people in his present territory know too much about him. That is the price of success. And Ben Price may be thought of as Jimmy's price of success. Unfortunately, Jimmy has committed four serious crimes since his release from prison. This is already enough to put his nemesis back on his track.



 Ben Price investigated the scenes of the robberies, and was heard to remark: “That's Dandy Jim Valentine's autograph. He's resumed business. Look at that combination knob—jerked out as easy as pulling up a radish in wet weather. He's got the only clamps that can do it. And look how clean those tumblers were punched out! Jimmy never has to drill but one hole. Yes, I guess I want Mr. Valentine. He'll do his bit next time without any short-time or clemency foolishness.”



So Ben Price becomes an even worse antagonist. Jimmy falls in love, decides to become respectable, becomes a successful businessman in Elmore, Arkansas and one of the most popular men in that community. Now Ben could not only send him to prison but could destroy all his dreams of happiness. If Jimmy lost Annabel, nothing else would matter to him. And on the day the little girl gets accidentally locked in the bank vault, which only Jimmy has the skill and the tools to open, there stands Ben Price in the main room waiting to arrest him. 


Jimmy shows his love for his fiancee and his strength of character by deciding to go ahead and crack the bank vault in spite of everything. He will be revealing his identity as a master safecracker, not only to Ben Price, but to Annabel and her entire family. He will be disgraced. He will be headed for a long stretch in prison--but it hardly matters if he has lost everything he had gained through his reformation. It turns out to his surprise that by cracking the vault he "retrieves" everything, whereas by not cracking the vault, and letting little Agatha perish, he would have lost everything and gone to prison. Ben Price is human, after all. He realizes that Jimmy is no long a threat but an asset to society, so he uses his own discretion to let him go.

Friday, June 8, 2012

In Lord of the Flies, how much do you think Ralph is to blame for what goes wrong on the island?

Ralph's inability to enforce rules and form a cohesive group focused on the necessities of survival and rescue played a significant role in the demise of civility on the island. Ralph was unable to effectively impose consequences for breaking rules and not following through with tasks which allowed Jack to gradually influence the boys to dismiss the agreed upon assignments. Ralph also gave Jack control of his own group, the hunters, which encouraged Jack to seek further control. Ralph also never punishes Jack for his disrespectful behavior. He allows Jack to push the boundaries of his authority which creates a situation where Jack can openly defy Ralph's commands. In addition to Ralph's lack of authority, he does not provide the boys with any type of positive reinforcement. He gives them no incentive to complete the tasks which encourages the boys to look toward a seemingly more sympathetic, fun leader in Jack. Also, there are several scenes throughout the novel when Ralph himself engages in savage behavior. He becomes enthralled in the opportunity to kill a pig when he joins Jack's hunting expedition and willingly participates in Simon's murder. Ralph's uncivil behavior portrays him in a negative light, and further encourages the boys to act immorally on the island. Ralph's lack of leadership is a major reason as to why the situation on the island decays.

According to Montresor, what makes a perfect crime?

In the opening paragraph of Edgar Allan Poe's short story "The Cask of Amontillado," the first-person narrator Montresor vows revenge against the perceived insults he has endured at the hands of Fortunato. Montresor has planned to murder his so-called friend. For Montresor, the crime of killing Fortunato can only be considered a perfect crime if two things are part of the plan. First, the crime must be undetected; second, the victim must understand exactly who is perpetrating the crime against him. Montresor's crime should go unnoticed and, moreover, he needs Fortunato to recognize Montresor is the one killing him. He indicates this by saying,



I must not only punish, but punish with impunity. A wrong is unredressed when retribution overtakes its redresser. It is equally unredressed when the avenger fails to make himself felt as such to him who has done the wrong. 



In the first sentence of this statement, Montresor uses the word "impunity," which is defined as being without fear of punishment. In the third sentence, he makes it clear that, as the "avenger," he needs to make certain the victim understands exactly what is happening. In the end, Montresor's plan works to perfection, and he claims in the final line that the bones of Fortunato were never discovered.

Thursday, June 7, 2012

In Night, what is the relationship between Elie and Moshe the Beadle?

In Elie Wiesel’s memoir, Night, chapter one details the relationship between Elie and Moshe the Beadle. Described as a wise vagrant, Moshe is a foreigner in Sighet, making him slightly suspicious to the rest of the Jewish community. Elie, however, considers him a harmless and even wise man.


Elie and Moshe first meet in 1941, when Elie is just thirteen years old. While praying at the synagogue, Moshe asks Elie why he cries when he prays. The conversation begins their relationship as student and teacher. Moshes becomes Elie’s tutor, instructing him in the ways of Jewish mysticism. Elie believes that learning the Kabbalah will answer his questions about God and reality.


In 1942 Moshe and the rest of Sighet’s foreign Jews are deported. Elie is upset, but quickly moves on. It comes as a complete surprise to Elie that Moshe returns after a few months. Moshe tells his story about nearly dying at the hands of the Nazis, but no one, not even Elie, believes him. Elie pities Moshe, believing with the rest of the Jewish community that Moshe’s warnings are the ramblings of a madman.

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

How has the structure of human and animal eyes influenced how they live?

Rather than the structure of our eyes influencing the way we and animals live, it would be more accurate to say the way we live/the way we engage with our surroundings has influenced the way our eyes are structured. 


Human eyes are adapted for creatures living in tall grass-lands and forests where differentiation between distance, color, and movement were crucial to our survival as a species. Unlike many animals that lived in a similar environment, our eyes and brains became adapted to finding movement and differences in color which allowed us to spot predators that may have been camouflaged in the tall grasses. Our eyes, however, didn't need to see extreme differences in color or even different wave-lengths, such as mantis shrimp which can see ultraviolet light, or raptors whose eyes are extremely specialized for spotting very small prey from hundreds of feet in the air. This leaves us being very good at detecting the "average" spectrum of red, blues, and greens, but not much else.


Animals had to make similar adaptations. Many predatory fish, for example, rather than develop extremely detailed vision, swim low and look upwards using the light trickling down from the surface. If they see a shape moving that is a different color than the surface, they will investigate. On the other hand, most deep sea fish have eyes that have no cone capable of detecting red light, as red light is the first wavelength to completely disperse in the upper waters and won't make it into the deep oceans. Some predatory fish use this to their advantage and have specialized red glowing anglers that only they can detect, leaving their prey shining brightly and completely unaware. 


To recap, the way our eyes and brains interpret light do have an effect on the way we live, but our environments and the way we and other animals survive has had much more of an impact on the way our eyes worked best. Evolution has guaranteed most species the best eyes possible for each of their unique survival conditions. Hope this helped!

Monday, June 4, 2012

How does Heidegger contrast the earth and the world and how does this difference between "on the earth" and "in the world" illuminate what he is...

The essay “The Origin of the Work of Art” by German philosopher Martin Heidegger explores the notion of what art is. He posits that art not only expresses truth but creates it, adding to a community’s shared understanding.


In the passages quoted in the question, Heidegger uses a Vincent Van Gogh painting of a pair of peasant shoes to illustrate the difference between art and other things or “equipment.” This leads to his discussion of the terms earth vs. world.


Heidegger defines world as disclosed meaning, the web of signification and relationships in day-to-day existence. The world is the human sphere of activity, culture, existence. Art is capable of manifesting someone else’s world. By contrast, the way art resists explication comes from the earth aspect. Earth for Heidegger is a somewhat mystical concept, the darkness from which all that exists emerges. The world exists and is illuminated against the backdrop of the earth, that which is concealed and by its nature closed, unknowable. Heidegger explains that Earth “unfolds itself in an inexhaustible abundance of simple modes and shapes.”


The world and earth are in opposition to each other, which Heidegger describes as a striving, the rift and also the common ground between the two. Art exists at this rift because it both proceeds from the knowable world and resists definition. No single interpretation of an artwork can completely capture its entire meaning. In simple terms, the world is that which is open and knowable while the earth is that which is concealed, unknowable.


The YouTube link below further explains this essay and Heidegger’s distinction between the concepts world and earth.

Sunday, June 3, 2012

What were the interests of the humanists?

Humanism was an intellectual movement which is generally associated with the Italian Renaissance. Its emphasis was the humanistic arts as set forth by the classical Greeks and Romans. It did not, as most modern people assume, refer to a materialistic and non-theistic philosophical outlook. In fact, most of the Renaissance humanists were thoroughly Christian in their worldview, although they were more apt to criticize the Church than Christians in the middle ages.


As historian Peter Partner explains in Renaissance Rome, Portrait of a Society 1500–1559:



Humanism was not an ideological programme but a body of literary knowledge and linguistic skill based on the "revival of good letters", which was a revival of a late-antique philology and grammar.



The humanists believed that medieval scholars had corrupted Latin and the other humanities (such as literature), so they sought to restore it to its original beauty by "purifying" it according to the way it was used by Cicero and other classical authors.


Similarly, the humanists adopted a policy of ad fontes ("back to the sources") in most humanistic disciplines. By this, they meant that one should emphasize the primary sources of classical antiquity rather than commentaries or re-tellings. This resulted in new and better translations of classical works (including the Bible). The pursuit of ad fontes was made possible by a number of discoveries of primary source texts.

How does the description of setting reveal the changing economic and social conditions in Miss Emily's town in "A Rose for Emily"?

While the descriptions of the town certainly change throughout the course of the story, even the descriptions of Miss Emily's house reflect the changing economic and social conditions. 


Her house, intricately decorated with cupolas, spires, and scrolled balconies, has fallen out of date and into disrepair. The speaker says that her house used to be white, which suggests that it has yellowed with age or that the paint has chipped to reveal the material underneath. The speaker also says that her house is located on "what had once been our most select street," suggesting that it is no longer select. 


The description of Miss Emily's attitude towards change, as she seems hostile to others and even vanquishes tax collectors from her property, shows that she does not care for the modern. When the town implements a postal service, she will not even accept address numbers. When the next generation grows up, no one is interested in Miss Emily's china-painting lessons, so her doors remain closed for the rest of her life. The town advances and becomes modernized, and time seems to pass around Miss Emily. The only unchanging aspect of the story is everyone's curiosity and interest in the life of Miss Emily. 

Where does Ralph hide, and how did Jack and his savages force Ralph out of his hiding spot?

In the last chapter of the novel, Ralph tells Samneric that he plans on hiding in a thicket next to Castle Rock. Ralph hopes that by hiding close to Castle Rock, the savages will never think to look for him and pass by him while they begin their search. While Ralph is eating the piece of meat that Samneric gave to him, he thinks about how he will crawl deep into the thicket and cover himself with creepers so that he will not be seen. The next morning, Ralph buries himself into the thicket and hears the savages searching for him. Unfortunately, Samneric give away Ralph's position and the savages roll a massive boulder in his direction. After the boulder narrowly misses Ralph, he begins to smell smoke. The savages decided to set the thicket on fire and smoke Ralph out. Ralph is forced to leave the thicket and the chase begins as Ralph runs into the forest. 

Saturday, June 2, 2012

In Night by Elie Wiesel, how do prisoners in the concentration camps treat one another?

In Elie Wiesel's Night, Elie, along with tens of thousands of unnamed prisoners, endure terrible conditions at the concentration camps. Life there is the ultimate struggle for survival. One’s humanity is challenged at every turn. Throughout the memoir, Elie experiences extreme kindness and extreme cruelty at the hands of other prisoners.   


The goal of Nazi Germany’s anti-Semitic policies was to dehumanize and then destroy the Jewish people. In the concentration camps, the Jews were treated worse than animals. This type of treatment caused some prisoners to give up their humanity in order to raise their own chances of survival. On his very first night at Auschwitz, Elie is subjected to a fierce beating by other inmates. “Dozens of inmates,” Wiesel writes, “were there to receive us, sticks in hand, striking anywhere, anyone, without reason.” Though not specifically stated, one can assume that these men are kapos, prisoners that the Nazis chose to keep other prisoners under control. Though they are also Jewish, the few benefits given to kapos are enough to make them turn on their fellow Jews.


Yet even on his first night at Auschwitz, Elie finds a reason to hope. At the bunkhouse, a seasoned prisoner greets the new arrivals. “Don’t lose hope,” the man tells the group, giving them advice on how to keep themselves alive. Wiesel goes on to write that “those were the first human words” he had heard since arriving at the camp.


A gleaming moment of humanity happens after Idek, a sadistic kapo, attacks Elie. A French girl Elie knows from the warehouse wipes the blood from his face and feeds him a bit of bread. Elie is so moved by her generosity that when the two meet by chance years after the war, he still remembers her, and is compelled to give her his thanks.

How are Juliet's circumstances tragic in Romeo and Juliet?

There are many tragic circumstances that apply to Juliet's life in Shakespeare's tragedy Romeo and Juliet. One of these tragic circumstances is her relationship to her parents. She is a member of the nobility, and as such, is raised by a nurse rather than her parents. When she does have occasion to see her parents, she is expected to be completely malleable to their will and show total obedience to them. This is evidenced in Juliet's response to her mother when she tells Juliet of Paris's marriage proposal. Juliet replies to her mother's question of whether or not she'd like to marry Paris by saying "I'll look to like, if looking liking move, but no more deep will I endart mine eye than your consent gives it strength to fly." (Romeo and Juliet, Act I, Scene III) In this speech she is saying she will look at Paris to see if she will like him romantically, but she won't look any more (or less) than her mother would like. Later on, her father disowns her for refusing to marry Paris. This shows that her worth to them was not so much as a beloved daughter but as an obedient pawn who would strike a good marriage to further their own wealth, influence, and esteem. 


Another tragic circumstance, of course, is that the young man she falls in love with happens to be the sworn enemy of her family. There is no likelihood at all, despite Romeo and Juliet's young and foolish imaginings, that either of their parents will ever consent to their match. 


Because of her young age and subordinate position as a woman during Renaissance times, she would not have been able to run away with Romeo, or follow after him when he is banished, making her a prisoner of her circumstances, which is certainly tragic. Women were not able to travel alone, be seen with a member of the opposite sex unchaperoned, or own property, and they were subjected to many other rules as well. 


Juliet accepts the Friar's plan and takes an herbal potion that will slow her heart rate and breathing to give the appearance of death in a desperate attempt to be with the one she loves. Tragically, the message that is sent to Romeo to let him know of the plot never reaches him, another way in which Juliet is a victim of tragic circumstances. They relied on a messenger to get the message to Romeo in a neighboring town, but the messenger was prevented from reaching him by a quarantine.


When Romeo finds Juliet and thinks her dead, he takes a deadly potion he received from an apothecary. She finds him dead when she awakes. She can find no reason to live in a world in which her love is gone, which is tragic, and uses his dagger to end her own life. 


Lastly, the bitter irony is that with the deaths of Romeo and Juliet, the families who had feuded for so long are able to make some peace with each other. If they'd been able to put aside their pride while Romeo and Juliet yet lived, the ending would have been quite different. 

In the book Night, what could Elie have done differently about his father's death?

While there was little Elie could have done to prevent his father's death, given how sick his father was, there was quite a bit that he could have done differently with regard to his reaction.


The text states that Elie did not pray or light candles (p. 106).  Both would have been acceptable; in fact, earlier in the book, the reader is introduced to the Mourner's Kaddish, a prayer said about, and over, the dead.  Elie did not have access to candles, but would have been able to recite the Kaddish had he chosen to.


Elie also did not cry.  He states that it "pained [him] that [he] could not weep," but concedes that he "had no more tears" (p. 106). He also admits that in some way, his dad's passing meant a greater freedom for him.  While he does not want to think that way, contemplating that freedom might have been some of the reason that he was unable to cry.  Thus, Elie has little to no outward reaction to his father's passing.

Friday, June 1, 2012

Who is the most admirable in Bret Harte's "The Outcasts of Poker Flat"?

Several of the characters could be considered the most admirable in the story. It could be argued that Oakhurst is the most admirable because of his "philosophical calmness." Oakhurst has the foresight to know that they should not camp for the night but should instead keep moving. Unlike the others, Oakhurst does not drink. Oakhurst also places provisions outside of the tent and sends Tommy to get help; thus he is thinking of others. Although Oakhurst is said to be the "strongest," he is also called the "weakest." Even though Oakhurst knows it would be best to keep moving, he is unable to convince the others and ultimately stays with them. Finally, Oakhurst commits suicide, which goes against his philosophy of holding on to your cards until the end. Thus, it is hard to see Oakhurst as the most admirable because he breaks his own principles in taking his life.


A strong case could be made for Mother Shipton. Although she runs a brothel and has rough language (both of which were accepted by the society of Poker Flat until recently), she is a motherly figure, as seen by her name. She protects the "children" (Piney and Tom), and even starves herself so that Piney will have more food and might survive. Unlike Oakhurst whose death can be seen as giving up, Mother Shipton's death is a sacrifice for others. This selfless act makes her quite admirable.

In Sophocles' play Antigone, why does Creon choose live entombment for the execution of Antigone?

Creon’s original decree prohibiting the burial of the bodies of any of those who had fought against Thebes set the punishment at death by stoning. However, when he is faced with the reality that it was his niece, Antigone, who defied the decree and buried her brother, Polynices, Creon seeks to find an alternative to such a direct and public execution by the state.


After his initial anger at Antigone subsides, Creon offers his niece a chance to save her life by renouncing what she has done. Antigone not only refuses to renounce her actions in burying her brother’s body, but adamantly proclaims that she would do the same again and that Creon’s law is an affront to divine law, and thus not to be followed. Creon, conversely, argues that the laws of the state are more important than the laws of the gods, and that he, as king, must follow the laws of the state as they are his own laws.


However, Creon is not unmindful that a public stoning of his niece, Oedipus’s daughter, would be problematic, especially given that she is also the betrothed of his son. Thus, Creon orders that Antigone be sealed in a cave with a measure of food. This action is not a direct execution by the state, but it is a sentence of death. And although everyone understands that it is a sentence of death, Creon states that it will not leave a stain on Thebes as it is Antigone’s choice whether she lives or dies, even though her food is limited and the eventuality is that she will die entombed in the cave. Thus, he ensures the enforcement of the law he had proclaimed while also insulating Thebes, and himself, from the stain of directly and publically executing Antigone.

Thomas Jefferson's election in 1800 is sometimes called the Revolution of 1800. Why could it be described in this way?

Thomas Jefferson’s election in 1800 can be called the “Revolution of 1800” because it was the first time in America’s short history that pow...