Friday, September 30, 2016

What would be a good thesis statement if you are writing a essay about literary elements in Fahrenheit 451 ?

That's an interesting question.


A good thesis sentence needs to be something you can argue. That means it can't be something like "There are literary elements in Fahrenheit 451." It should be clear, specific, and lay out the line of reasoning you plan to develop in your essay.


That means you need to think a bit about Fahrenheit 451 and the literary elements Bradbury uses in it. I'd start by making a list.


He uses symbolism throughout.


He intense imagery.


He uses allusions. (He alludes to other works of literature, and to mythology and religion.)


He uses hyperbole.


He uses irony.


And so on. I'd keep making that list, and then I'd assemble the results into a thesis statement that relates the literary elements used to the themes of the book. (That would mean thinking about the themes.)


Here are some examples.


In Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury primarily uses symbolism and irony to develop his themes of censorship and human nature.



Or something like this:


While Ray Bradbury uses a range of literary elements to develop his argument about the nature of books, thought, and humanity in Fahrenheit 451, his most powerful tools are symbolism and allusion.

Thursday, September 29, 2016

List five economic problems that the South faced following the Civil War.

After the war, the South had myriad  economic problems.  These included no more slaves, little industry, no money, ravaged lands, and a relatively uneducated workforce.  The South had a primarily agricultural economy, which was dependent upon free manpower, the slaves.  Once the slaves were free, for agriculture to continue, people would have to be paid to work the land.  But the South's coffers were empty because of the war.  Plantations had been used to house the sick or had been commandeered by the north, so there was little in the way of assets that could even be used as security.  Fields were ravaged, and entire cities were burnt and had to be rebuilt.  Taxation was of little use because no one had money.  The industrial economy was mostly in the north, so there were few factories for people to work in.  Changing from an agricultural to an industrial economy requires enormous investment in money and training.  There were only a few educational institutions of significance in the southern states, most of these being in the northern states.  This meant that a professional class was significantly underdeveloped as well.  It is almost easy to feel sorry for the South, until one remembers what a cruel and ugly institution slavery was.  

In The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, why does the meaning of the letter A change towards the end of the novel?

In the last chapter of the novel, Hawthorne reveals many themes.  The narrator describes the way Hester and Pearl left the colony, as well as the fact that Hester returns many years later.  In other words, of Hester's own free will, she decides to come back to the place where her misery had been because it was also where her love had been.  As a result, the narrator says that "the scarlet letter ceased to be a stigma which attracted the world's scorn and bitterness, and became a type of something to be sorrowed over, and looked upon with awe, and yet with reverence, too."  Hester could have tried to escape her punishment many years ago, and she did not.  She could at least have stayed away once she did leave, after Dimmesdale's death.  However, her commitment to him, to this place, impresses everyone, and so the letter stops being a bad thing and comes to symbolize her commitment and love instead.  People begin to come to her in their times of need, and she becomes the community's favorite auntie: a wise woman who has been through a great deal and is thus qualified to help others through their trials.  She is selfless and kind, and this is always respectable.

Wednesday, September 28, 2016

A thermos bottle contains 0.150 kg of water at 4.1 degrees celsius. When 9 x 10^-2 kg of a metal, initially at 96.2 degrees celsius, is put into...

The amount of thermal energy gained or lost is calculated as:


thermal energy gained or lost = mass of substance x specific heat x change in temperature.


In this case, the temperature of water has increased and it has gained some thermal energy. This amount of thermal energy can be calculated as:


Thermal energy gained by water = mass of water x specific heat of water x (final temperature - initial temperature)


= 0.15 kg x 4186 J/kg/K x (21.7 - 4.1) C = 11,051.04 J


The gain in thermal energy of the water is due to thermal energy loss by the metal, which can be written as:


thermal energy lost by metal = 9 x 10^-2 x C x (96.2 - 21.7)


where C is the specific heat of the metal in J/kg/K.


Assuming no heat loss,


thermal energy lost by metal = thermal energy gained by water


or, 9 x 10^-2 x C x (96.2 - 21.7) = 11,051.04


solving the equation, we get, C = 1648.2 J/kg/K or 1.648 J/g/K

What are variables and what is a control group?

Scientists try to solve problems or questions in a logical manner using the scientific method of problem-solving.


Once a well-thought out question has been asked, a possible answer to that question or hypothesis is put forth and later tested. In scientific research, an experiment is conducted.


In an experiment, there must be two groups. One is called the experimental group and the other is called the control group. The only difference between the two groups is that the experimental group gets the variable being tested while the control group does not. All other variables are kept constant.


In a practical example--one could pose a question--will plants grow taller with fertilizer? A possible hypothesis is --if given fertilizer, plants will grow taller.


To test this hypothesis, you will need an experimental group which will be given fertilizer and a control group which will not get fertilizer. However, the type of plants, amount of soil, amount of water, sun exposure, container to grow plants, will all be kept constant. These are variables that must be the same in each group. The fertilizer is the independent variable being tested by the researcher and only the experimental group will receive it. The control group will not. The dependent variable in this case is plant growth which can be measured as height and kept in a data table.


At the end of the experiment, the height of the experimental and control group plants will be measured. If the fertilizer helped the experimental group grow taller than the plants in the control group, the hypothesis is accepted. If there is no difference, or if the experimental group is smaller than the control group, the hypothesis is rejected.


To summarize, variables are all the factors that must be kept constant in an experiment except for the independent variable that the researcher is testing in the experimental group. The control group does not receive the independent variable. By having an experimental and control group, the researcher can compare results to see if a hypothesis is valid or invalid.

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Why did science challenge the view that the Earth was at the center of the universe?

Because it simply didn't fit the data! This is what science does best---it overturns beliefs that are widely-held but inconsistent with observed data.

The theory of geocentrism, on which the Earth was the center of the universe and cosmic bodies orbited around it, was intuitive to most people, and as a result it was in place for centuries. Before precise measurements were possible, this theory was close enough for most purposes; there were some weird anomalies like the retrograde motion of Mars, but there were ways of sort of fudging the theory to make it work well enough, such as epicycles where orbits were actually orbits within orbits, multiple layers on each other so that they could occasionally move the opposite direction for a short period.

But as measurements became more precise, this fudging of the theory became more and more untenable. A new theory was needed, and ultimately proposed by Copernicus and then advanced by Galileo. On this theory, heliocentrism, the Earth and other planets all revolve together around the Sun. Heliocentrism was a much more parsimonious explanation for observed cosmic motions than the epicycles, but it still did not catch on immediately, in part because the Catholic Church had committed to geocentrism as the official (and ostensibly, infallible) view of the Church. Moreover, Galileo's theory of circular heliocentric orbits still didn't quite work, though it was better than the old theory.

It wasn't until Kepler realized that the orbits were not circles but ellipses that finally the heliocentric theory won, because then it completely accounted for all observations in a simple and elegant theory. Kepler's theory was very precise for its time, and we wouldn't discover any errors in it until centuries later, when extremely precise measurements supported Einstein's theory of General Relativity instead. The difference between the two was so small it took 20th-century instruments to even detect it.

For their part, the Catholic Church finally admitted Galileo was right... in 1992.

Monday, September 26, 2016

`(2+x)y' = 3y` Find the general solution of the differential equation

Recall that `y'` is the same as `(dy)/(dx)` . Then in the given problem: `(2+x)y'=3y` , we may write it as:


`(2+x) (dy)/(dx) = 3y.`


 This will help to follow the variable separable differential equation in a form of `N(y) dy = M(x) dx.`


To rearrange `(2+x) (dy)/(dx) = 3y` ,cross-multiply `(dx)` to the other side:


`(2+x)dy =3y dx`


Divide both sides by `(2+x)` :


`((2+x)dy)/(2+x) =(3y dx)/(2+x)`


`dy =(3y dx)/(2+x)`


Divide both sides by `y` :


`(dy )/y=(3y dx)/((2+x)y)`


`(dy)/y=(3dx)/(2+x)`


 To solve for the general solution of the differential equation, apply direct integration on both sides:


`int (dy)/y=int (3dx)/(2+x)`


For the left side, apply the basic integration formula for logarithm


`int (dy)/y= ln|y|`


For the right side, we may apply the basic integration property: `int c*f(x) dx = c int f(x)dx` .


`int (3dx)/(2+x)= 3 int (dx)/(2+x)`


 Let `u =2+x` then du= dx


The integral becomes:


`3 int (dx)/(2+x) = 3 int (du)/u`


We can now apply the  basic integration formula for logarithm on the integral part:


`3 int (du)/u= 3ln|u| +C`


Recall `u =(2+x) ` then `3 int (dx)/(2+x) =3ln|2+x| +C`


Combining the results from both sides, we get:


`ln|y|=3ln|2+x| +C`


`y=e^(3ln|x+2|+C)`


` y= e^(ln(x+2)^3+C)` 


Law of Exponents:` x^(n+m)= x^n*x^m`


`y= e^(ln(x+2)^3)*e^C`


`e^C =C` is an arbitrary constant, so


`y= Ce^(ln(x+2)^3)`


` y = C(x+2)^3`

What is verbal narration?

Verbal narration is using words to convey a story, or narrative. Though the term "verbal" typically means something which is spoken, a verbal narrative may also be accomplished through the written word. In contrast, a visual narrative is storytelling achieved only through images. Some media combine visual and verbal narrative, where parts of the story may be demonstrated alternately between words and images.


An example of verbal narration might be a book which tells a story with no pictures, such as the Harry Potter series. Much popular music also relies on verbal narrative to tell a story. An example of visual narrative might be a comic book which relies entirely on pictures, like The Snowman by Raymond Briggs. Silent film with no subtitles and the practice of mimes are also examples of visual narrative.

Summarize the effects of the Civil War on the United States.

The Civil War had a huge impact on the United States. There were several issues that were resolved by the Civil War. Prior to the Civil War, the South believed the state governments should have more power than the federal government. The Civil War settled this question. Federal laws take priority over state laws. Another issue that was resolved was the issue of slavery. The Civil War ended slavery in the United States.


The Civil War sent a few other messages. People began to realize there had to be a better way to resolve disputes than by having Americans fight each other. Over 600,000 people were killed in the Civil War. The casualty rate of the Civil War was over one million hurt and wounded. In some cases it took years for those injuries to heal. The Civil War cost billions of dollars. It took years for the land in the South to recover from the damage that occurred because of the fighting and the destruction that occurred there.


The Civil War had a tremendous impact on the United States.

Sunday, September 25, 2016

Compare and contrast Mildred and Clarisse. Can either character survive in their society? What roles do they play in their society? How did their...

Clarisse is Montag's affable neighbor who enjoys nature, conversations, and leisure time with her family. Clarisse's positive attitude and love for life make Montag aware of his own meaningless existence. Clarisse is scrutinized by her teachers and essentially shunned by society because she is vibrant and acts differently than her peers. Clarisse inherits her lively, curious personality from her family. They are loving, intelligent people who raised a charismatic daughter.


Mildred is Clarisse's foil throughout the novel. Mildred is shallow, callous, and insensitive. She constantly watches the parlor televisions and listens to her Seashell radios to escape from reality. Mildred is unaware of her meaningless existence and is content living a superficial, unexamined life. Mildred's personality has been shaped by the authoritarian government that promotes constant entertainment and violence.


Clarisse does not fit into the dystopian society and is viewed as an outcast, while Mildred is the typical, ignorant citizen who passively accepts the authoritarian agenda. In my opinion, neither character can survive in the dystopian society. Clarisse will eventually be arrested by the government or killed by a savage citizen. Although Mildred might live longer, she will probably die of an overdose. Interestingly, both characters do not survive in the story.

Friday, September 23, 2016

Binge eating disorder is common in the United States. What are some major effects of this disorder?

Binge eating disorder is a condition in which the affected individual feels compelled to eat, even when they are not hungry, and is unable to stop eating when they have had enough. Such individuals eat a large amount of food within a short period of time.


The major effects of binge eating are physical, emotional and social. The physical effects of binge eating include weight gain, obesity and medical problems associated with obesity. These include diabetes, heart diseases and a higher risk of having cancer. Other physical effects include headaches, muscle aches, joint pains and menstrual problems.


The emotional problems associated with binge eating can be incredibly debilitating. People who suffer from this disorder may experience varying degrees of stress with difficulty sleeping. They may become depressed and unable to cope with daily routines such as attendance at school or at work. In severe cases, they may develop psychological problems such as having suicidal thoughts.


Most people with this disorder are often embarrassed by it. They try to hide their problems from close friends and family. They may become socially isolated and unable to help themselves. People with this problem should seek help from trained health providers such as psychiatrists and psychologists. This will help them to modify their thoughts and beliefs, leading to healthy eating habits and an improved physical and mental state.

Thursday, September 22, 2016

Who is the forceful character in "Once Upon a Time"?

Upon finishing reading the story for the first time, readers might have the feeling that the mother-in-law, described as "the wise old witch," is the most forceful character in the story. It was her original warning to the couple "not to take on anyone off the street" as a housemaid or gardener. This provides impetus for the couple to fear the "other." The mother-in-law doesn't come into play with many of the other decisions the family makes, though. She gives them bricks for Christmas to heighten the wall, but she is not overtly involved in their decision to install the coil.


Many of the decisions the couple makes seem to be mutually agreed upon, but the housemaid is often involved as well. The wife agrees with the housemaid that bars should be installed on the windows, so they do it. The husband agrees with the housemaid not to give food to the "loafers" when his wife wants to show them compassion. The couple strolls around the neighborhood observing their neighbors' walls and seem to agree on the "Dragon's Teeth" option. The trusted housemaid seems to be the first on the scene when the boy gets caught in the coil.


From these events, one can see the wife is the least forceful of the adult characters, giving in to those who advise her not to show compassion. She shudders at the sight of the coil on the neighbors' wall, which the husband takes as her preference for that style because of its effectiveness.


The housemaid may, in fact, be the most forceful character. Her reactions to the outsiders result in two actions from the couple: putting bars on the windows and not giving food to the loafers.


The husband is the second most forceful character. He has the electronically controlled gates installed, and he seeks to take action and calm his wife.


Despite the housemaid and the husband having more influence over specific actions in the story, the mother-in-law's overarching attitudes set the stage for the couple's behavior, and she may be the one whose opinions are most vociferous, which is why she is referred to as a witch.

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

In Forced Founders: Indians, Debtors, Slaves, and the Making of the American Revolution in Virginia, what role did Native Americans and slaves have...

In this book, Holton asserts that slaves and Native Americans helped propel the Virginia gentry towards revolution against the British. It should be noted that he does not think that any one group caused the American Revolution but that different groups created what he calls a "web of influence" that helped move the Virginia gentry towards revolution (page xvii). The crown's policies about Native Americans propelled free whites towards revolution because the British policy favored avoiding a war with Native Americans. To do so, the crown restricted the movements of whites who wanted to settle on the western frontier. As Holton writes, settlers had been moving westward in Virgina towards the Appalachians dating back to the 1740s. By the late 1760s, white families had already reached the Appalachians. However, the Proclamation of 1763, passed by the British crown, established a western boundary to white settlement that the Virginia House of Burgesses wanted to repeal. Their petition to do so was rejected by the Privy Council in England. The British policies about slaves also moved the Virginia gentry towards revolution. In 1775, the British Governor, Dunmore, began to provide runaway slaves with arms to counter settlers who disagreed with royal policies. Arming slaves also went against the interest of the gentry and moved them towards the American Revolution.

Does distribution add to cost and not value?

There is a good argument to be made that whatever distribution adds to cost, it more than makes up for in enhanced value. Part of the value that we deliver to a consumer is the value of having a good or service when and where the consumer wants it. A good may sit in the warehouse for free, but the customer is not going there—in most cases—to buy it. We want what we want at the time and place we want it. I do not, for example, want to drive to a television factory to buy a television. I want to drive no more than a few miles to buy one. I do want to eat breakfast at 2:00 am, after a night out on the town. That is why those diners stay open: to provide the value of the right product and service at the right time. I realiz printed newspapers are a dying breed, but I highly value finding the morning newspaper at my front door. Whatever it costs to distribute, most people were perfectly willing to pay for this service. And, I might note, some people would drop the paper if the delivery was not up to par, for example, on the front lawn instead of at the door or wet from the rain. So distribution, getting the right thing to the right place at the right time in the right condition, is in most cases going to add value to the degree that it is well worth the cost, either in business gained or in avoidance of business lost.

Tuesday, September 20, 2016

`sqrt(1-4x^2)y' = x` Find the general solution of the differential equation

To be able to evaluate the problem: `sqrt(1-4x^2)y'=x` , we express in a form of `y'=f(x)` .


 To do this, we divide both sides by `sqrt(1-4x^2)` .


`y'=x/sqrt(1-4x^2)`


The general solution of a differential equation in a form of `y'=f(x)` can


 be evaluated using direct integration. We can denote y' as `(dy)/(dx)` .


Then, 


`y'=x/sqrt(1-4x^2)`  becomes `(dy)/(dx)=x/sqrt(1-4x^2)`


This is the same as  `(dy)=x/sqrt(1-4x^2) dx`


Apply direct integration on both sides:


For the left side, we have: `int (dy)=y`


 For the right side, we apply u-substitution using `u =1-4x^2` then `du=-8x dx` or  `(du)/(-8)=xdx` .


`int x/sqrt(1-4x^2) dx = int1/sqrt(u) *(du)/(-8)`


Applying basic integration property: `int c f(x) dx = c int f(x) dx` .


`int1/sqrt(u) *(du)/(-8) = -1/8int1/sqrt(u)du`


Applying Law of Exponents: `sqrt(x)= x^1/2` and  `1/x^n = x^-n` :


`-1/8int1/sqrt(u)du=-1/8int1/u^(1/2)du`


                     ` =-1/8int u^(-1/2)du`


Applying the Power Rule for integration: `int x^n= x^(n+1)/(n+1)+C` .


`-1/8int u^(-1/2)du =-1/8 u^(-1/2+1)/(-1/2+1)+C`


                      ` =-1/8 u^(1/2)/(1/2)+C`


                      ` =-1/8 u^(1/2)*(2/1)+C`


                      `= -2/8 u^(1/2)+C`


                      ` = -1/4u^(1/2)+C or -1/4sqrt(u)+C`


Plug-in `u = 1-4x^2` in `-1/4u^(1/2)` , we get:


`int1/sqrt(u) *(du)/(-8)=-1/4sqrt(1-4x^2)+C`



Combining the results, we get the general solution for differential equation


`( sqrt(1-4x^2)y'=x)`


 as:


`y= -1/4sqrt(1-4x^2)+C`

Monday, September 19, 2016

Why is the Reconstruction era considered a revolution, and why does Foner say it is unfinished?

The Reconstruction Era began a revolution in the freedom of former slaves. They experienced new elements of freedom, such as the rights of citizenship given in the 14th Amendment. African-American men were given the right to vote with the 15th Amendment. In addition, at least in theory, they were freer to control their own movements, marry, and join the church and community organizations of their choosing.


On the other hand, the reality of Reconstruction was that the promise of complete freedom for former slaves was not fulfilled and the revolution, as Foner writes, was unfinished. For example, while some freed slaves were promised land, not many were able to attain land ownership and instead worked as sharecroppers on others' land. In addition, the right of African-Americans to vote was often curtailed in the later years of Reconstruction and afterward. The revolution that began during Reconstruction continued into the 20th century and beyond. 

How is Henry Gatz similar to Jay Gatsby?

Henry C. Gatz, the father of the man who reinvents himself as Jay Gatsby, is similar to his son in that they are both fairly socially unskilled.  When Nick tries to have a conversation with him about Gatsby and the funeral arrangements in chapter nine, Gatz doesn't respond in ways that would be expected or even thank Nick for what he has done.


Hours after his arrival at Gatsby's house, Nick encounters Gatz "walking up and down excitedly in the hall" with obvious pride "in his son's possessions." Like Gatsby, Gatz sees material success as the mark of a person's worth and accomplishment and doesn't question the source of his son's fortune.  


It seems that both father and son believed in the viability of the American Dream.  Mr. Gatz shows Nick Gatsby's boyhood schedule and "general resolves" and proudly tells Nick that "Jimmy was bound to get ahead" and "he always had some resolves like this."

Sunday, September 18, 2016

What does Mr. White mean by, "I should hardly think that he'd come tonight"?

Mr. White says, "I should hardly think that he'd come to-night" mainly because of the bad weather conditions outside. A bit later he describes those conditions to his son and his wife:



Of all the beastly, slushy, out-of-the-way places to live in, this is the worst. Pathway's a bog, and the road's a torrent.



They are expecting a visit from Sergeant-Major Morris, but Mr. White doubts he will come on such a stormy night. At the same time, he is talking to distract his son Herbert. The two men are playing chess and the father sees that he made a bad move and gave Herbert a chance to checkmate him. A moment earlier, Mr. White called attention to the sounds of the storm outside in order to distract his son.



"Hark at the wind," said Mr. White, who, having seen a fatal mistake after it was too late, was amiably desirous of preventing his son from seeing it.



The author of "The Monkey's Paw," W. W. Jacobs, was also using Mr. White's comments on the weather in order to create an ominous mood and to apprise the reader of the dark, isolated setting of this little house. The small family of father, mother, and grown son seem snug inside, with the fireplace spreading warmth and cheer. This will come to an end when Sergeant-Major Morris sells Mr. White the monkey's paw.


In Part III of the story, when there is that terrible knocking at the door, it will seem unlikely that it could be anybody out there but the mangled and partly decayed Herbert returned from the grave. Who else would have come at night to that isolated setting in such bad weather?

`r = 7%` Find the time necessary for $1000 to double when it is invested at a rate of r compounded (a) anually, (b) monthly, (c) daily, and...

Formula for compounding n times per year `A=P(1+r/n)^(nt)`


Formula for compounding continuously `A=Pe^(rt)`


A=Final Amount


P=Initial Amount


r=rate of investment expressed as a decimal


n=number of compoundings per year


t= time in years



a) r=7%  n=1 (annually)


`A=P(1+r/n)^(nt)`


`2000=1000(1+.07/1)^(1*t)`


`2=1.07^t`


`ln(2)=tln(1.07)`


`ln(2)/ln(1.07)=t`


`10.24=t`


Final answer: 10.24 years



b) r=7% n=12 (monthly)


`A=P(1+r/n)^(nt)`


`2000=1000(1+.07/12)^(12*t)`


`2=1.0058^(12t)`


`ln(2)=12tln(1.0058)`


`ln(2)/[12ln(1.0058)]=t`


`9.93=t`


Final Answer: 9.93 years



c) r=7%  t=365 (daily)


`A=P(1+r/n)^(nt)`


`2000=1000(1+.07/365)^(365*t)`


`2=(1.00019)^(365t)`


`ln(2)=365tln(1.00019)`


`ln(2)/[365ln(1.00019)]=t`


`9.90=t`


Final answer: 9.90 years



d) r=7% compounded continously


`A=Pe^(rt)`


`2000=1000e^(.07*t)`


`2=e^(.07t)`


`ln(2)=.07tlne`


`ln(2)/[.07lne]=t`


`9.90=t`


Final answer: 9.90 years

Bradbury uses the Hadley family in order to illustrate what in "The Veldt"?

The family is used to demonstrate how people have become too dependent on technology.


Technology can make our lives easier.  However, there comes a point when it runs our lives instead of us using it.  Bradbury is using the clueless Hadley family to demonstrate that.  They have outsourced everything in their lives to technology, including the care of their children.


The Hadleys are clearly disturbed by their nursery.  They spent a fortune on it, and it is state of the art.  It seems to telepathically communicate with their children.  On its walls their innermost psyche is revealed.  It is a frightening revelation.  The children have very dark minds.


Mrs. Hadley is frustrated because the house has taken over her role.  She no longer is mother to the children.



"I don't know - I don't know," she said, blowing her nose, sitting down in a chair that immediately began to rock and comfort her. "Maybe I don't have enough to do. Maybe I have time to think too much. Why don't we shut the whole house off for a few days and take a vacation?"



Mr. Hadley does not seem to understand his own children.  He brings in a psychologist to find out what is wrong with them.  Although the psychologist is a person, the bringing in of this man demonstrates another attempt by the Hadleys to distance themselves from their children.  They do not try to solve the problem themselves.


In the end, the Hadleys are destroyed by the technology they have let into their homes.  Their children have become monsters, and use their technological marvel to turn on their parents.  The parents never really saw it coming.



"Don't let them switch off the nursery and the house," he was saying.


Mr. and Mrs. George Hadley beat at the door. "Now, don't be ridiculous, children. It's time to go. Mr. McClean'll be here in a minute and..."


And then they heard the sounds.



The family demonstrates to the reader why it is important to make human connections.  The more disconnected we get from each other as we rely on technology, the harder it is to reconnect.  Eventually we do not realize what we have lost until it is too late.

Why did England fail to develop a large empire at the same time as Spain and Portugal?

England (it will not be Britain until the Act of Union in 1707) just went through two very costly wars in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries--the Hundred Years War and the Wars of the Roses, respectively.  These wars were quite expensive and took away from royal coffers.  While Spain was fighting the Moors and unifying the kingdoms of Aragon and Castille into Spain, England had to expend its resources in a longstanding war with France in which it lost its territory in Brittany and in a civil war.  Also, Spain and Portugal had more territory to draw its natural resources from and a larger population.  Spain and Portugal also had trade networks with the Italian city states which supplied most of Europe's best mariners for exploration--Columbus, while he sailed for Spain, was really Genoese.  

Saturday, September 17, 2016

What is the current situation with regard to immigration in the US today?

There are many ways to answer this question as it is very broad and somewhat vague.  Let us look at some of the most important facts about immigration today.


Perhaps the most important fact about immigration today is that we are in midst of an immigration boom.  As you can see from the graph at the bottom of the link below, we are near to an all-time high in percentage of Americans who were born in another country.  That percentage has more than doubled since 1970 and is only slightly lower than the percentage in the last great wave of immigration in the early 1900s.


A second very important fact about immigration today is that it is comprised of both legal and illegal immigrants.  This is the first time in our history that this has been true.  This is mainly important because it makes our political dialogue about immigration more complicated as we have to try to distinguish between our attitudes towards illegal immigrants and legal immigrants.


A third fact has to do with illegal immigrants and how they come.  While we have people like Donald Trump who vow to build a wall across our border with Mexico to prevent illegal immigrants from entering the country, this is really not how all of them come.  According to this link, something like half of all illegal immigrants actually entered the country legally but then did not leave when they were supposed to.


A fourth fact about immigration today has to do with the ethnicity of today’s immigrants.  In the past, immigrant waves were made up exclusively of Europeans.  Today, this is not true.  Today’s immigrants come from Latin America, particularly Mexico.  They come from Asia and Africa.  They are, therefore, much more different from previous waves of immigrants in terms of ethnic background.  This is changing the racial makeup of our country.


A final fact about immigration today is that it is very controversial.  Some Americans think we should allow more immigration on humanitarian grounds.  Others say our economy needs more unskilled workers to do tasks “native” Americans won’t.  Others say we need to keep out the unskilled and only allow in skilled workers whose skills are in demand and who will add a great deal of value to our economy.  Others simply oppose immigration because they believe we have too many immigrants in our country as it is.  Immigration has become an issue that divides us more than it ever has in the past.

What does Soda say is the hardest thing about Ponyboy and Darry fighting?

In Chapter 12, Darry and Ponyboy begin to argue about Pony's grades and Sodapop unexpectedly runs out of the house. Pony is confused as to why Sodapop ran out of the house, and Darry picks up a letter from Sandy that was returned unopened. Darry explains to Pony that Soda had told him that he loved Sandy before she left for Florida. Darry also says Soda cried all week when Pony was gone after Sandy left for Florida. Ponyboy and Darry then run after Sodapop and catch up to him. When Darry and Pony find Sodapop, he says he is sick of their constant fighting. Sodapop says he feels like he's in a tug-of-war match between the two and he's being pulled apart. Sodapop says it is extremely hard for him to pick sides when they are fighting with each other because he supports both of them. He is simply sick of being the middleman and wants his two brothers to get along.

Friday, September 16, 2016

What is the conflict that drives the action and provides tension in Henry V?

In William Shakespeare's Henry V, the main conflict driving the characters is an invasion during the Hundred Years' War, a series of battles in which England attempted to conquer French land. At the beginning of the play, King Henry V decides to launch another invasion of France on the advice of the English nobility. The odds are against Henry's troops; the English army is so much smaller and relatively lacking in technology that the French royals don't even consider the invasion a threat at first. Henry's men struggle to take the town of Harfleur, and many of them fall ill due to the struggle of battle. The French army then sends 60,000 troops to fight against Henry's weakened 12,000. After a brutal day of battle, Henry receives news that his men managed to kill 10,000 French troops- a decisive victory for England. The play ends with Henry courting Katharine, the princess of France, in the hopes of uniting the two countries under a single crown. The conflict is resolved as Katharine's father, King Charles VI, gives Henry his blessing to marry Katharine and signs a peace treaty between the two nations.

Thursday, September 15, 2016

How can I compare "Lake Isle of Innisfree" by W. B. Yeats and "Mirror" by Sylvia Plath?

At first glance, these two poems and their poets make an unlikely pairing and are quite dissimilar. In “The Lake Isle of Innisfree,” Yeats describes his yearning to move to a favorite island retreat in Ireland. He wants to build a house here, in the style of Henry David Thoreau at Walden Pond, where he will raise both beans and bees. It’s a peaceful, natural place. Yeats thinks of this spot even when he is in the city, where he says he hears and feels the pulse of the lake waves “in the deep heart’s core” of the earth. It is a poem of comfort and positive energy, with anticipation for the future and what lies just ahead.


In contrast, “Mirror” by Sylvia Plath is an introspective poem. It is told in the viewpoint of the mirror that Plath has looked into for her entire life: reflecting her progression from youth to old age. Plath – or at least, the woman who serves as the main character -- is distressed about the changes in her appearance. Mid-poem, the mirror is equated with a lake. The woman has taken it down from the wall and has laid it on the top of a dresser so that she doesn’t have to see it whenever she enters the room, but only when she wants to. She intends to control it. By the end of the verse, the reflection of her image is that of a “terrible fish.” The woman sees no beauty in this “lake.” She fears the future and the continual changes that come with it.


Yeats looks forward to going to the lake someday. (In reality he never gets a chance to move to this favorite island, even though he lives to be 73 years old.) Plath looks at her mirror/lake every day with distaste and horror. (She suffers from depression throughout her life and commits suicide at the age of 30.) This comparison turns out to be a matter of personal perspective. How do you approach each day: with love, or with fear?

Define the term “structural deficit” and explain its long term effect on future budgets.

Government deficits can be made up of two kinds of deficit.  These are structural deficits and cyclical deficits.  Cyclical deficits exist because the economy is bad.  Tax receipts drop as incomes drop.  Things like unemployment benefits cost the government more because more people are unemployed.  This causes deficit spending that has come about because of economic weakness.  Structural deficits are deficits that exist even if the economy is strong.  These are deficits that come about simply because the government chooses to spend more than it can take in even when the economy is at a high point.


Structural deficits affect future budgets because they make it more likely that we will have deficits in the future.  Let us say that the government borrows a lot of money even though economic times are good. This raises the amount that we owe as a country.  It also raises the amount that we have to pay in debt service (interest payments) in the future.  This cuts in to future budgets.  It means that future Congresses will have less room to spend money because more money will have to go to debt service.  This can make it very hard for Congress to fund new programs that might seem necessary in the future or to pay for unforeseen events like wars or disasters.  In short, when we run a structural deficit, we build up debt that will tie our hands in the future. 

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

What evidence exists in the play of Romeo being frivolous or joking around a lot?

In Act 2, Scene 4, when Romeo sees his friends Mercutio and Benvolio, after having abandoned them the night before to sneak into Juliet's garden, Mercutio gives him a hard time.  He and Romeo engage in some witty repartee in which they make a number of sexual references via words with double meanings.  This section very much shows Romeo's frivolity and joking nature. 


Mercutio is irritated that Romeo blew them off, but Romeo says that he had some important business to attend to, and so he had to risk being discourteous.  Mercutio replies, "That’s as much as to say, such a case as yours / constrains a man to bow in the hams" (2.4.23-24).  He suggests that Romeo's important business was sexual (that it made him "bow in the hams" = to flex his butt muscles as he would do if he were having sex).  Then, when Mercutio claims that he is "the very pink of courtesy," Romeo turns the joke back on him by referring to a "pink flower," by which he means female genitalia.  Mercutio acknowledges the joke, and Romeo says, "Why, then is my pump well flowered," meaning that he has had a lot of sex (his "pump" = his penis).  This kind of joking, sexual banter, where Romeo and Mercutio attend to one-up each other with puns and double entendres, shows how frivolous Romeo can be.

How has geography influenced the settlement of the United States?

Geography plays an important role in any settlement.  In the United States, this is evidenced by the location of many major cities in the nation.


Most early settlers to the United States arrived from European countries.  Settlers came from England, France, Holland, Spain, and other European countries.  They sailed on ships across the Atlantic Ocean and arrived on the East Coast of what is today the United States.  There are many historically important cities on or near the Atlantic Ocean, such as Boston, New York City, Charleston, Savannah, and St. Augustine.  These were the ports of entry for many European immigrants and African slaves.  Other cities were developed along rivers and bays that fed into the Atlantic, such as Hartford, Philadelphia, and Baltimore.  Boats were the most common mode of long distance travel in the 17th, 18th, and early 19th centuries, so it was important to build major cities along the water.  Transport of goods was done primarily by ships and boats.  Most major cities were located along waterways for trading purposes.


Prior to the 19th century, most settlers lived in the Eastern United States.  Westward expansion became a popular idea in the 19th century, and more cities were established further inland.  Popular travel routes, such as the Oregon Trail, encouraged settlers to move west.  They established cities along the way and on the West Coast.  Land parcels beside rivers and lakes were still popular locations for building cities.  Cities were also built along the Pacific Ocean.

What does Scout mean when she says "everything would come out all right" in To Kill a Mockingbird?

When Scout listens to her father during the Tom Robinson trial, she feels like everything is going to be okay. 


Scout has never been to a trial.  With all of the buildup that this one has had, she does not know what to expect.  The events leading up to it have been very dramatic.  The trial itself could hardly compare. 


First, everyone in town seemed opposed to Atticus defending Tom Robinson, the African-American man accused of raping a white woman.  Then, a group of white men tried to lynch his client.  Atticus was able to talk them down.  These events themselves were very frightening and stressful. 


Once the trial starts, Scout listens to Atticus and feels better about everything.



So far, things were utterly dull: nobody had thundered, there were no arguments between opposing counsel, there was no drama; a grave disappointment to all present, it seemed. Atticus was proceeding amiably, as if he were involved in a title dispute. With his infinite capacity for calming turbulent seas, he could make a rape case as dry as a sermon. (Ch. 17)



Scout feels safer with Atticus's calm approach to the trial.  After all of the chaos leading up to the trial, she starts to feel better once the trial starts and it is actually pretty boring.  Atticus always makes her feel safe, just as he made Tom Robinson feel safe when the lynch mob tried to attack him.


Things are not all right, however.  The trial may not be what Scout expected, but it is not dull.  Tom Robinson's freedom is at stake.  Atticus takes the case very seriously.  It is also very difficult for both Jem and Dill, who are older and understand what is going on better than Scout.  Dill is horrified at the racism Mr. Gilmer shows to Tom Robinson.  Jem is convinced that the verdict will be innocent, and shattered when it is not.

Monday, September 12, 2016

How would I write a well-balanced chemical equation for a reaction between carbonic acid and potassium hydroxide?

When carbonic acid reacts with potassium hydroxide, we get potassium carbonate and water. This reaction can be written as:


`H_2CO_3 (aq) + KOH (aq) -> K_2CO_3 (aq) + H_2O (l)`


Here, carbonic acid is a weak acid and potassium hydroxide is a strong base. 


The above reaction is not balanced. A balanced equation has the same number of atoms of each element on both sides. Here, potassium, hydrogen, and oxygen are not balanced—you can count the number of atoms of each of these elements on both sides of the equation and verify.


The equation can be balanced and written as:


`H_2CO_3 (aq) + 2KOH (aq) -> K_2CO_3 (aq) + 2H_2O (l)`


Here we can see that 1 mole of carbonic acid reacts with 2 moles of potassium hydroxide and generates 1 mole of potassium carbonate and 2 moles of water.


Hope this helps.

What are two big events in Andrew Clements' No Talking?

The first big event in Andrew Clements' No Talking is the appreciation for silence Dave develops while studying Mahatma Ghandi for his report on India. Dave's new appreciation for silence leads him to think critically about his classmate Lynsey babbling about useless things and to say something insulting to her. Dave insulting Lynsey is a second big event, the event that guides the rest of the story.

While researching India, Dave learns that Mahatma Gandhi used "words and ideas" to practically drive the "whole British army out of India all by himself" (p. 11). Dave also learns that Gandhi spent one day out of every week in total silence as a way to "bring order to his mind" (p. 13). After reading this, Dave begins to think about his own talking habits and to wonder if silence might improve him, might make him smarter and better at playing sports. Therefore, Dave decides to challenge himself by taking Gandhi's vow of silence for the day, which is one of the first major events in the story.  

However, by the time he reaches lunch recess that day, Dave breaks his vow. During lunch, Dave overhears Lynsey babble to her friends for a very long time about how one of her classmates had bought the sweater she had had her eye on at a store and how the classmate had later tried to offer it to Lynsey as a gift, but Lynsey refused it. Hearing Lynsey babble on about her ridiculous behavior makes Dave lose his temper, and Dave shouts at her, "If you had to shut up for five minutes, I bet the whole top of your head would explode!" (p. 19). When Lyndsey retorts, saying that Dave talks about ridiculous things just as much as she does, Dave goes so far as to say something completely untrue: "[B]oys never talk as much as girls do, ever!" (p. 20). Dave's verbal attack on Lynsey is the second major event of the book and helps create the story's conflict. After this moment, all the kids in the fifth-grade class challenge each other to a vow of silence, boys vs. girls, and this silence causes unexpected problems at school.

Sunday, September 11, 2016

Why was the Plessy v. Ferguson case important to the era of segregation?

The Plessy V. Ferguson case in 1896 started segregation as a legal entity in the United States.  In 1892, Homer Plessy, a man who was one eighth black, violated Louisiaina's Separate Car Act which required whites and blacks use separate rail cars.  The penalty for violating this act was $25 or twenty days in jail.  Plessy's argument was that this law violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, the first of which prohibited slavery and the second one that is credited with making the former slaves American citizens. The majority opinion of the Supreme Court ruled that "the Fourteenth Amendment gave all citizens equal status before the law," but it said nothing about giving people separate access to public utilities.  This created the "separate but equal" amenities that would be in much of the South until the early 1960s.   There would be separate lunch counters, schools, water fountains, and bathrooms, and often these would not be of the same quality that whites got to use.  

Describe one U.S. policy and one soviet policy that contributed to the fall of the Soviet Union and European communism in the early 1990s. What...

The economic system of Soviet Communism was not sustainable; the question was not if it would fail but how and when. By trying to coerce people into working instead of giving them the incentive of working for higher incomes, the USSR handicapped its own economic productivity substantially.

But there were definitely policy decisions along the way that triggered the final collapse.

One US policy that was very important was a huge surge in US military spending under Ronald Reagan. Rumor has it that this was actually an accident, the result of clerical errors combined with the high inflation of the time. Whether or not that's actually true, the reality clearly was that the US enormously increased military spending in the 1980s, and in fact increased it so high that due to US economic superiority there was simply no way the USSR could possibly have matched US military production even if they spent literally everything they had on the military.

Partly as a result of being so obviously outmatched, but also in an effort to pull back from the conflict that the Soviet Union was obviously losing ground in and modernize the Soviet economy, Gorbachev restructured Soviet military policy, called perestroika ("restructuring") and glasnost ("transparency"). He downsized the Soviet military and pulled out troops from a number of countries in Eastern Europe.

But Eastern European countries could see that the capitalist (or, more properly, mixed-capitalist social democracy) system in Western Europe was leading to much greater prosperity and freedom than the Communist system they were under. Without Soviet troops holding them to the Communist system, a number of Eastern European countries began to defect from the Soviet Union and begin reforms to be more like Western Europe. Shortly thereafter, other countries left the Soviet Union, and in a few years the whole USSR had fractured apart.

Saturday, September 10, 2016

Some people say that Hitler was Jewish. Is that true?

There have been reports that Adolf Hitler may have had some connections to Judaism, and therefore he was Jewish. The irony in this is that Hitler wanted to destroy the Jewish people in Europe and attempted to accomplish this by creating the extermination camps throughout Europe.


The question about Hitler’s Jewish connections is centered on Hitler’s grandfather. Hitler’s father was born to an unknown man. His father's mother did work in the home of a wealthy Jewish person. As a result, there is a remote possibility that Hitler's grandmother might have somehow become pregnant by a son of this Jewish person.


There also is a question about Hitler’s DNA. He apparently had a gene that was uncommon in Western Europe and has been found in some Jewish people.


Both of these theories, however, are not strong enough to support the claim that Hitler was Jewish. It is generally accepted that Hitler was not Jewish.

Friday, September 9, 2016

What are the similarities between an American alligator and a Nile crocodile?

Alligators and crocodiles are considered fierce and are known to attack both animals and human beings. They also share some similarities in their appearance. Both the Nile crocodile and the American alligator have long tails with jagged backs. The animals have webbed feet, which coupled with the long tails makes them adept swimmers. Alligators and crocodiles are both reptiles and can exist in both salt and fresh water. However, different species have different preferences with regards to main habitats. The animals hunt both in water and on land. The Nile crocodile and the American alligator have impeccable night vision owing to the vertically slit pupils. Both Alligators and crocodiles are considered carnivorous with most of their diet consisting of small fish to large prey like buffaloes and wild boar.

What happened to the Vanguard rocket launched by Dr. Werhner Von Braun?

From what I know, the Vanguard rocket design was intended to be the first step into satellite launches for the US. Von Braun didn't actually work on the Vanguard rockets and was opposed to their use. He was more in favor of using his own rocket designs to go to space.


Von Braun is still perhaps one of the most influential members of the US push into space, though. His work with the Saturn rockets, which were far larger and more useful than the Vanguard, could be used to send equipment into space, whereas the Vanguard had a payload of only a few kilograms.


As for what happened to the Vanguards that were launched, they would burn up on reentry or explode on launch. Vanguards had a 3/11 success rate, which compared to even the ancient space shuttle is dismal; the technology was still very new at the time, and shoddy workmanship didn't help. The project was eventually abandoned when stronger, more successful and efficient rockets became available.

What characteristic of a mongoose makes it hard to frighten one and accounts for the mongoose motto: "Run and find out"?

The motto stated in the question comes from Rudyard Kipling's short story "Rikki-Tikki-Tavi." The motto perfectly embodies the central character, Rikki-Tikki. "Run and find out" refers to the natural curiosity of a mongoose. The story says it is nearly impossible to frighten a mongoose because they are so consumed with curiosity. That means when a mongoose comes across something that should be terrifying, the mongoose isn't scared, just more. This holds true in Kipling's story. When Nag and Rikki-Tikki first meet, Nag raises himself up and spreads his hood open. The text says Rikki-Tikki was momentarily frightened, but then remembers he used to eat snakes. From that moment his curiosity takes over, and Rikki-tikki begins questioning Nag, not fearing him.  

How does poverty affect education?

Poverty affects education in a myriad of ways, for reasons individual and societal. Let's look at a few of each.


At the individual level, a learner who comes from a background of poverty has decided disadvantages. This is a student who is more likely to experience food and housing insecurities.  We cannot learn properly when we are hungry. Nor can we find a spot to do homework while living in a shelter or a car.  And these, sadly, are situations in which poor students find themselves.  Children from impoverished families are also often lacking in parental support, not because parents do not want to provide support, but because they are working too hard and are too stressed, just to provide even the basics.  Children from impoverished families usually lack the amenities that their more comfortable schoolmates have access to, such as summer camps, music lessons, museums, and science centers.  These place poor children behind, since this sort of informal learning is so powerful and important. Research shows that poor students have smaller vocabularies than their schoolmates. Some of this is no doubt because poorer parents have less time to talk to their children, but also because the parenting styles are often different, with less emphasis placed on informal conversation in the household, a more authoritative "Children are to be seen and not heard" style. I would also guess that in poorer households parents do not spend much time reading to their children, because of a lack of time and energy and a lack of knowledge of the importance of this, not just for vocabulary development, but for emotional and cognitive development generally.  Thus, the poor student begins school at a considerable disadvantage that he or she endures throughout.


At a societal level, the effects of poverty are at least as dismaying. Funding for school comes from federal, state, and local coffers, with the largest proportion provided by the local level. In a school district that is poor, this means there is not enough money for the physical plants, the schools, to be properly cared for, there is not enough money for teaching and support staff, there is not enough money for textbooks and supplies, and there is not enough money for a well-rounded curriculum, which should include art, music, and physical education.  Poor students typically have worn or outdated textbooks, to the degree they have textbooks at all.  The classrooms are often crowded.  Handouts are fewer because the budget for paper usually has run out well before the school year is over.  School nurses and counselors might be at a given school once or twice a week, if there are any school nurses or counselors. At a larger societal level, the implications of this are staggering, since we are trying to educate children who are in no position to learn, students who have little or no access to the tools of education because of the poverty of their communities.  This used to be thought of as solely an urban problem, but it is becoming increasingly clear that suburban and rural school districts can be impoverished, too. All of society does and will bear the burden of these effects, with increasing crime rates, higher rates of incarceration, increasing poverty, poor health, lower consumption, and fewer tax dollars.  


This upcoming generation of poor students, I fear, is a generation that is educationally lost. We seem to be lacking in the societal and political will necessary to properly educate all students from all parts of society. A proper education is not one that simply prepares one for a job, but one that molds a student into a well-rounded, empathetic, and thoughtful person who is able to be an effective participant in a democracy.     

Thursday, September 8, 2016

What does the graveyard look like in The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by Mark Twain?

The graveyard is old and overgrown.


According to Huck, you can cure warts with a dead cat if you take it to the graveyard at midnight "when somebody that was wicked has been buried." You then have to say the chant 'Devil follow corpse, cat follow devil, warts follow cat, I'm done with ye!'  This ritual is supposed to get rid of the warts.


Huck and Tom visit the graveyard at night, and, as planned, Huck has the dead cat. The graveyard is full of tall grass, which the boys have to "wade" through. The graveyard is described as the "old-fashioned Western kind." The graveyard is on a hill not far from the village, and surrounded by a “crazy board fence.” Most of the headstones are no longer even legible.



Grass and weeds grew rank over the whole cemetery. All the old graves were sunken in, there was not a tombstone on the place; round-topped, worm-eaten boards staggered over the graves, leaning for support and finding none (Chapter 9).



Three huge elm trees are growing near the grave. The cemetery is oppressively silent. The only sound is the hooting of an owl in the distance, and the boys are clearly unnerved. The boys then hear three men arguing as they dig up one of the graves. These men turn out to be Injun Joe, Doctor Robinson, and Muff Potter.



Finally a spade struck upon the coffin with a dull woody accent, and within another minute or two the men had hoisted it out on the ground. They pried off the lid with their shovels, got out the body and dumped it rudely on the ground (Chapter 9).



Robinson and Potter get into a fight, and Robinson hits Potter with a headstone. While Potter is unconscious, Joe stabs Robinson while Potter. Joe then puts the knife in Potter’s hand and tells him he was the one who stabbed Robinson. Potter believes him and swears Joe to silence. Of course, the boys know what really happened.

Wednesday, September 7, 2016

How does Oliver Parker's 2002 film The Importance of Being Earnest compare to Oscar Wilde's play?

Oliver Parker's 2002 film adaptation of Oscar Wilde's play remains relatively true to its source material and does not compromise Wilde's satiric playfulness.  The play points out and pokes fun at many of the flaws of the Victorian upper class -- especially their tendency to adopt a very high moral tone while, simultaneously, indulging their less acceptable, but very human, desires -- and the movie retains this purpose.  In the interest of pacing, the movie does mix elements of the first and second acts of the play; therefore, the audience meets Cecily, Ms. Prism, and Doctor Chasuble just after becoming acquainted with Jack, Algernon, Gwendolyn, and Aunt Augusta.  Rupert Everett is a perfect Algy: irreverent, charming, and lovably and incurably dishonest; likewise, Reese Witherspoon's Cecily, fantasizing that she is the heroine of some pre-Raphaelite painting, is appropriately hilarious and absurd.  The movie is as smart and witty as the play, its satire as playfully pointed, and the casting is superb. 


One major difference, however, is that the play ends with Jack finding that his name really is Ernest, but the movie ends with him learning that his name is actually John (for which "Jack" is typically short).  Perhaps the movie's producers felt that the play's ending was a little too convenient; further, making the choice to have Jack end the film with a lie (when he tells Gwendolyn that his name is really Ernest) makes it clear that he will not change, and that he will continue to be trivial until the last.

What is the mother's true motivation for giving the flower girl sixpence?

The mother overhears Eliza, the lower-class, Cockney flower girl, refer to her son as Freddie and asks Eliza how she knows her son's name. Eliza, trying to survive, asks Freddie's mother to buy some flowers in exchange for the information. The mother pays a sixpence, more than the flowers are worth, because that is the smallest change she has (actually, she gets the sixpence from her daughter). The mother doesn't want the change Eliza offers because the amount of money is so trivial to her.


In the end, it works out that Eliza didn't know the son's name, but simply called him Freddie generically, because that is what she does. She says she calls men "Charlie" as well, to try to be pleasant. The daughter accuses her mother of throwing the sixpence away, but we can imagine the mother might be relieved that her son doesn't know Eliza—though later he will.

Tuesday, September 6, 2016

How did the Cold War affect the United States goverment?

First, look at how the Cold War affected the U.S. government in terms of foreign policy.  Due to a threat of nuclear war with the Soviet Union, America had to always have nuclear preparedness plans with the capacity to deliver these weapons, whether through bombers, missiles, or naval delivery systems.  This was money that could have been spent elsewhere, such as on domestic programs.  Also, America got itself into foreign entanglements such as Vietnam and Korea in order to contain communism, killing thousands of young men and injuring many more.  America also got itself involved in covert actions in Guatemala, Iran, and Cuba in order to support rightist, U.S. friendly governments.  Many in the developing world still do not trust that America is the beacon of democracy that it claims to be, but rather they think that America only wants leaders that will act in its interest.  


Domestically, the Cold War ensured that there would be a draft for the military well after WWII ended.  America encouraged more people to go into science and math fields in order to ensure it would have more scientists than the Soviet Union.  The FBI kept reports on people who it suspected may be Communist--this is even more controversial today as more information comes out about the program.  The Interstate Highway system was designed by Eisenhower to be used in war, but it really helps Americans move from place to place easier and has promoted the growth of suburbs at the expense of the inner city.  While it never turned into a true "shooting" war, it is hard to imagine America without the Cold War.  

How can I use quotes from Man's Search for Meaning to answer the following question? The consequences of unconsciousness and unexamined...

Frankl shows that even the people who are the subjects of violence on the basis of arbitrary, dehumanizing categories--Frankl himself was consigned to concentration camps for no other reason than being Jewish--can internalize the dehumanization and "ways of seeing" of the captors. As he writes:



On the average, only those prisoners could keep alive who, after years of trekking from camp to camp, had lost all scruples in their fight for existence; they were prepared to use every means, honest and otherwise, even brutal force, theft, and betrayal of their friends, in order to save themselves. We who have come back, by the aid of many lucky chances or miracles—whatever one may choose to call them—we know: the best of us did not return.



I will give just a few examples of stereotyping and "ways of seeing" leading to brutalization and dehumanization. Almost any page of the book will offer more examples. What the camps shows is that once the norms of civilization are swept away, and once a group or groups are labelled as inferior or evil, no barbarism is too much to expect. 


Frankl describes the careless, dehumanized way the guard in charge would flick his hand to the right or the left to indicate which of the prisoners arriving at Auschwitz would be sent to the work camp and which to the crematorium:



The significance of the finger game was explained to us in the evening. It was the first selection, the first verdict made on our existence or non-existence. For the great majority of our transport, about 90 percent, it meant death. Their sentence was carried out within the next few hours.



Frankl discusses the many way the camps, by labeling certain groups such as Jews as subhuman, led to extreme brutalization. He describes the indifference to the death of other people that quickly descended. In one case, prisoners do the following to the still warm body of a corpse:



One grabbed the remains of a messy meal of potatoes; another decided that the corpse’s wooden shoes were an improvement on his own, and exchanged them. A third man did the same with the dead man’s coat, and another was glad to be able to secure some—just imagine!—genuine string. All this I watched with unconcern.



There is also the moment that a guard's stereotyping of Jews as subhuman leads him to anger Frankl by treating him as an animal:



Instead, he playfully picked up a stone and threw it at me. That, to me, seemed the way to attract the attention of a beast, to call a domestic animal back to its job, a creature with which you have so little in common that you do not even punish it.



We also learn that " the feelings of the majority of the guards had been dulled by the number of years in which, in ever-increasing doses, they had witnessed the brutal methods of the camp."

What was the first permanent settlement in North Carolina?

There were several attempts to establish a permanent settlement in North Carolina. The French claimed this land in 1524. However, they were looking for a shorter route to Asia as well as gold and silver. Since North Carolina satisfied neither of these goals, the French didn't stay here. The Spanish came next and established a settlement at Cape Fear. That settlement was not successful as many people died from hunger and disease.


Eventually, the British came to North Carolina. They established a settlement on Roanoke Island. However, that settlement also wasn’t successful. The first permanent settlement in North Carolina was actually established by Virginians in 1653 in the Albemarle Sound region. In 1663, the King made eight of these settlers the “lords proprietors” of Carolina. The first governor of Albemarle was Sir William Berkeley. In 1691, this region was named North Carolina and made into a colony in 1712. In 1729, North Carolina became a royal colony.


Thus, the first permanent settlement in what is now called North Carolina was in the region of Albemarle Sound.

What is a central idea in Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck?

One universal idea that prevails throughout the narrative of Of Mice and Men is that of the strength that lies in the fraternity of men.


As one who believed in the ideology of socialism--perhaps even communism--John Steinbeck perceived the homelessness and alienation of the dispossessed men as a result of failed capitalism in the 1930's. The only strength and hope that these men could gain was in unifying with others. When some of the other workers at the ranch, such as Candy and Crooks, hear about George and Lennie's dream of owning a little farm of their own, it is only then that they begin to have some hope for the future by joining in this venture. 


When Curley, the son of the boss, comes into the bunkhouse in a bellicose manner time after time, the men must do their best to not antagonize him lest they lose their jobs. Then, when the amazingly strong Lennie crushes Curley's hand, they all feel empowered, knowing that Curley will stay away from the bunkhouse while his hand heals, and out of embarrassment he will not tell the truth of what has happened to this hand. 


After Candy loses his old dog, he is very forlorn and anxious about his job as swamper. However, he regains hope after he asks if he can be part of George and Lennie's dream of owning a farm.



"S'pose I went in with you guys. Tha's three hunderd an' fifty bucks I'd put in. I ain't much good, but I could cook and tend the chickens and hoe the garden some. How'd that be?"



George half-closed his eyes. "I gotta think about that...."
But, then, George calculates if he and Lennie save their wages at the end of the month, they would have one hundred dollars more. "I bet we could swing her for that." For, the first time, George ponders his and Lennie's dream as a real possibility because of another man's joining in with them.


Later, when Candy tells Crooks about the place they are going to have, Crooks asks if he can be a part of this dream, too.



"...If you...guys would want a hand to work for nothing--just his keep, why I'd come and lend a hand. I ain't so crippled I can't work...if I want to."



With the fraternity of the men, the dream of George and Lennie becomes a real possibility.


The renowned metaphysical poet John Donne wrote that "no man is an island, entire of itself"...men must join together in order to have strength, helping each other to have a life with some dignity. As Crooks has noted, a man needs someone else with him by whom he can measure himself.

Saturday, September 3, 2016

What is the difference between the plot and summary of a novel?

The summary of a novel is a review of the important events that happened. This includes the events of the story’s plot.  When someone says the “plot” of a novel as opposed to the summary of a novel, it could be that this refers to an explication of the plot, also known as a story grammar. 


A story’s plot consists of five elements. These are the exposition, rising action, climax, falling action, and resolution. These are terms we use for analyzing the structure of the story. They are often plotted on a graphic that looks like a line graph, starting out straight, then going up, coming to a point, going down, and then going flat again. Each section of the graph represents one of these parts of the plot. 


The exposition is the beginning of the story. This is where the story’s characters, setting, and inciting incident are introduced. The events that follow are called the rising action. This is where the story develops. The rising action leads to the climax, which is the turning point of the story and usually the most dramatic part. From the climax to the resolution is the falling action. This is where the story is being wrapped up. The resolution is the story’s ending. 


A summary is used to review the basic events of the plot. It will include the main characters and describe the setting.  The most important events that happen in the story will then be briefly described.

After watching this video from A Midsummer Night's Dream, from 1:36:52 and stopping at 1:54:00, what props are being used? Are they appropriate?...

The troop of actors who perform "Pyramus and Thisbe" for the Duke in Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream, are average men who are not highly educated. They are also tradesmen from the village who do not have a lot of money; so, they must be resourceful in order to produce their play. As a result, the tiny wooden swords and/or daggers used are enough to satisfy their needs for the play. Straw is used for Pyramus' beard and the lion's fur, which seems appropriate for what these average men would be able to acquire for their production. Also, the rough cast and lantern, which signify wall and the moon, are these players' way of creating a set with their own bodies; and, this is completely acceptable for their imaginations and to present to an audience. Audiences can accept whatever the actors tell them to in order to participate in the play.


However, some audience members, like Demetrius, make fun of their costumes and props. For example, Demetrius criticizes and/or makes fun of the moon because the props are ineffective for him; but, he lets this pass eventually to follow the plot of the play. Therefore, the props and costuming might be a little raw, which cause some to laugh, but in the end the story is accepted over the cheap props and costuming.

Friday, September 2, 2016

How does one distinguish one type of weapon from another through the examination of bloodstains?

Bloodstains and splatter marks can leave numerous clues about attacks and injuries sustained. Bloodstains can relate information about the type of weapon used, where a person was hit, how many times they were hit, the order in which hits occurred, the movements of the victim, direction of attack, and more.


Many clues can reveal the type of weapon. If a bloodstain is long and straight and the droplets are elongated, you can infer the blood was moving fast. This might imply the use of a slash with a knife; blood flowing off the tip of a knife splashes out like paint from a brush. If the stain shows a big, circular spatter, you might think a high powered firearm was used; when a bullet creates an exit wound, it will pull a large amount of blood and tissue with it. Smaller projectiles will not evoke as much splash, so the power of the weapon can also be inferred. If the bloodstain shows a big, curved spatter of blood, there is evidence of a struck artery. Splashed blood on clothing can also give away a weapon. Blood on the dominant hand's sleeve would suggest the use of a melee weapon like a knife.


Bloodstains with large, round drops are from slow-moving blood and can be caused by slow bleeding as a result of lacerations or crushing blows.

Describe in detail 2-3 differences between functionalism and conflict theory

Functionalism and conflict theory are two different accounts of how societies form and are structured, based on different basic assumptions about human behavior.

Functionalism says that human beings are fundamentally cooperative, and will work together to build institutions and achieve mutual goals. The whole society is often conceptualized as like a living organism, with individual people playing a role similar to cells in that organism.

Conflict theory says that human beings are fundamentally competitive, and societies consist of individuals and groups in a constant state of conflict over goals and resources. Society is conceived more individualistically, though often the unit of analysis is some sort of group of people (such as "the working class" or "women") rather than individuals.

Both theories contain valid insights, and both have flaws. Human beings are both cooperative and competitive, and while social structures do serve many useful mutual goals, it is also quite common for different people and groups of people to come into conflict. In general, good sociologists apply insights from both theories rather than maintaining a dogmatic view of one or the other.

One of the most important differences between the two theories is what they say about the economic system and distribution of wealth; taken in their most extreme forms, functionalism would say that the economy is a well-oiled machine that functions optimally and the inequality it creates is necessary for efficiency, while conflict theory would say that the economy is a constant state of class warfare in which different groups of people try to grab a larger piece of the pie for themselves. An extreme functionalist would probably oppose redistribution of wealth as undermining the efficiency of the system, while an extreme conflict theorist would likely demand a great deal of redistribution of wealth as a means of making the conflict more fair.

Another important difference between them is how they view social change. Functionalism actually has a hard time making sense of social change, because if institutions are serving their function, why change them? Functionalists could reply by saying that as the world changes, the institutions needed can also be changed, and societies will make the necessary changes. Or, they might say that change, or at least rapid change, is bad, and should be avoided. Conflict theorists on the other hand have a very clear explanation for social change: Everyone is fighting, and sometimes one side wins and the other side loses. Such victories can be temporary or permanent, partial or total. Societies change as different groups take the upper hand in the fight and impose their own goals on the rest of society. Many conflict theorists believe that rapid social change is necessary, because one particular group (namely, rich, White, straight men) has been winning far too much and other groups should be given their fair share.

What are the risks in each step of the Solvay process?

The risk with step one of the Solvay process is the intense heat needed to break apart the calcium carbonate. According to this paper on calcium carbonate, an activation energy of 40.6 kcal/mole (about 1000 degrees centigrade) is required to begin decomposition. In addition, the release of free CO2 could be harmful, and the quicklime (CaO) is an irritant and releases heat in contact with water.


The risk with step two is the ammonia. Ammonia can be toxic and causes lung damage.


Step six makes a strong base solution of calcium hydroxide, so protective equipment should be worn while using the solution. Calcium hydroxide can cause skin irritation, burns, lung damage, and blindness. 


I suggest wearing safety goggles during most of the process, and a mask if possible while working with ammonia and any of the lime products.

How does the setting bring about changes in the conflict between Ulrich and Georg in "The Interlopers" by Saki?

When the lightning during the storm strikes in the contested forest, the huge birch tree that is struck by lightning pins Ulrich von Gradwitz and Georg Znaeym beneath its fallen branches. Held captive in this manner, the two enemies begin to reconsider their attitudes about each other.


Having been locked in conflict for generations, the two enemies who are now pinioned down near each other utter both "thank offerings and sharp curses." At first, the two men threaten that their entourages will reach them before the other's. Georg promises his men will free him, and in so doing, the mass of the trunk of the big tree will roll over the top of Ulrich. "For form's sake I shall send my condolences to your family," he says to his enemy. Ulrich claims his men will arrive first, and when they are able to release him from the branches, he will remember Georg's threat.



Only as you will have met your death poaching on my lands, I don't think I can decently send any message of condolence to your family.



As time passes and no men appear, Ulrich manages to bring his partially free arm around to his outer pocket and draw out his wine flask. After some time he manages to pour some of the warming liquid down his throat. Looking over at his enemy, Ulrich feels some pity and offers his suffering enemy some of his wine. Georg declines, telling him there is so much blood in his eyes that he can barely see; besides, he adds, he will not drink with an enemy.
Ulrich is quiet for a time, but "in the pain and languor that Ulrich himself was feeling," his hatred seems to die. Now, he calls Georg his neighbor, and he declares that if his men arrive first, he will have them help Georg first.



Lying here tonight, thinking, I've come to think we've been rather fools; there are better things in life than getting the better of a boundary dispute. Neighbor, if you will help me to bury the old quarrel, I—I will ask you to be my friend.



Georg Znaeym is silent for a long time—so long, in fact, Ulrich thinks that Georg may have fainted. At last, George answers haltingly:



How the whole region would stare and gabble if we rode into the market square together. No one living can remember seeing a Znaeym and a von Gradwitz talking to one another in friendship. And what peace there would be among the forester folk if we ended our feud tonight...I never thought to have wanted to do other than hate you all my life, but I think I have changed my mind about things...Ulrich von Gradwitz, I will be your friend.



They lie silently, imagining how things will be after this reconciliation. When no men appear after all this time, Ulrich suggests they shout for help. The two men raise their voices in a hunting call. In a short while, they hear sounds, but the sounds belong to neither company of men. Tragically, the men's conflict will soon end, but the end will come from their mutual deaths, not their reconciliation. For, the "rescue" company that runs toward them are not men, but wolves.

Thomas Jefferson's election in 1800 is sometimes called the Revolution of 1800. Why could it be described in this way?

Thomas Jefferson’s election in 1800 can be called the “Revolution of 1800” because it was the first time in America’s short history that pow...